Check the Report

Research Parts

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Cluj Youth Mapping project is the first-of-its-kind collaborative initiative to map youth activities, organisations, and the broader ecosystem that supports young people in the Cluj Metropolitan Area (CMA), representing an estimated one third of population in CMA. It includes two interconnected parts: a participatory research report, presented here and an accompanying interactive visual map, which is in development. 

This participatory project serves as an enabler to foster inclusion and agency of youth in participatory decision making in Cluj-Napoca to improve wellbeing of its young residents. The Cluj Youth Mapping project strives to become a lighthouse for other cities in Romania, Europe and the world, by making visible what is often invisible – an emerging network of diverse youth organisations, their needs, interests and challenges in a rapidly developing urban ecosystem – and helping imagine new pathways where young people actively co-create cities of the future.

Cluj Metropolitan Area with an emerging map of organisations, institutions and informal youth groups. Photo credit: Roland Vaczi

This participatory mapping and research project was developed by the Cluj Youth Federation (FTC) in collaboration with SDG Colab, as part of the OurCity living laboratory for youth wellbeing, supported by Fondation Botnar from November 2023 to September 2024. 

The research highlighted several critical challenges:
Financial Constraints: Youth organisations in Cluj face significant financial limitations, impacting their ability to sustain and expand their activities.
Trust Deficits: There is a lack of trust between youth organisations, the private sector, and local administrations, hindering collaboration and resource sharing.
Human Resources: Securing and retaining skilled youth workers remains a significant challenge.
Infrastructure Issues: High housing costs and limited access to appropriate workspaces and lack of youth centres, further strain youth organisations.
Recognition of youth workers: Youth workers seek greater recognition and legislative support to legitimise and enhance their contributions.

Opportunities and Challenges
The project underscored the potential of youth as key contributors to societal development in Cluj. However, it also highlighted the need for systemic changes to ensure that young people and the organisations that support them can thrive. The participatory mapping process revealed the importance of creating a more inclusive and supportive environment for youth, particularly in areas such as education, mental health, culture and civic participation.

Actionable Recommendations
A comprehensive outline of the recommendations is included in Chapter V, a summary is provided here:

1. Enhance youth participation in city decision making: Create more opportunities for young people to participate in decision-making processes shaping urban development, including strengthening participatory budgeting, activating consultative youth council and establishing youth advisory roles in public institutions for example Cluj County Council or other institutions with attributions in the field of youth or a deputy mayor for youth.
2. Utilise and continuously update the interactive map: The interactive visual map developed through this project should be actively used and regularly updated to provide compass for young people to engage, to inform decision-making and to monitor progress in the youth sector.
3. Increase public funding for youth organisations: Boost financial support by increasing it annually by 3 % to ensure that youth organisations can effectively address the needs of young people and participate in decision making in Cluj.
4. Strengthen youth infrastructure: Expand and improve youth-specific infrastructure, such as developing at least 10 youth centres by 2030, to provide safe, inclusive spaces for young people in CMA. This includes building further collaborative mechanisms to strengthen the social innovation ecosystems, for example developing a locally owned OurCluj living lab serving youth priority needs. 

5. Promote and recognize Youth Work: Advocate for greater recognition of youth workers through legislative support and public awareness campaigns to put into practice the new provisions of the Romanian occupations code.
6. Foster trust and collaboration: Encourage development of processes that cultivate lasting partnerships between youth organisations, the private sector, and local administrations to build trust and maximise resources.
7. Prioritise mental health and wellbeing: Increase access to mental health services and promote development of an ecosystem of wellbeing initiatives tailored to the needs of young people.

Conclusion

The Cluj Youth Mapping project has laid the groundwork for a more inclusive and effective youth sector in Cluj. By leveraging the insights gained from this participatory process, public, private and civic stakeholders in Cluj can take concrete steps to support the city’s youth and ensure their voices are heard in shaping the collective future. 

Furthermore, knowing that young people are increasingly leaving Romania, these findings matter more than ever. According to the National Institute of Statistics, last year was a record of over 20,000 permanent emigrants for 15-35 years old, double the usual average. With nearly one third of the EU population below 30 years old, and youth movements building across the countries, policymakers can no longer ignore youth voices and their hopes for a better future.

PREFACE

Why does mapping of youth organisations matter for the city?

This document is focused on systematically understanding and documenting the landscape of youth activities, stakeholders, policies, and best practices in the Cluj Metropolitan Area (CMA). It is complemented with an interactive visual map and supported by an evolving database (in development). Cluj-Napoca, a vibrant intermediary city and historic capital of Transylvania in central Romania, has evolved throughout the years in regards to the opportunities, trends, investments and the population. In regards to population growth in the Cluj County, below is the evolution according to the census:

Cluj-Napoca remains the largest municipality in Romania, immediately after its capital city – Bucharest, even though the population in Cluj-Napoca has decreased by approximately 10,000 in the last 10 years.
Furthermore, out of the total number living in Romania, those aged 10-24 represent 16% of the population. In Cluj-Napoca, more than one third of the population is below 35 years old, influencing the present and future of the city, recognized for its education ecosystem.

Why is it interesting?

1. Participatory Mapping: It emphasises collaboratively and actively involving the community and stakeholders in gathering data. The primary focus here is on identifying both formal and informal youth organisations and documenting their activities. The result aims to be a living database and an interactive visual map, meaning it’s continuously updated and publicly accessible. In this way, we can have a clear record of the youth sector, as there is too little research or data available in the field. 

2. Youth Workers Mapping: This delves deeper into a specific category from the first objective. It aims to understand the current training models for youth workers, assess their impact, and determine any additional training needs to positively affect the local ecosystem. Too little is said about youth workers, and now is the time to bring them to the community’s attention.

3. Mapping the Enabling Environment for Youth: This is broader and encompasses an understanding of the various public, private, and civic organisations that support youth activities in the Cluj Metropolitan. Cluj-Napoca has been recognized for its education ecosystems, along with its large student population. an Area. It also aims to analyse relevant policies at multiple levels and gather research studies or reports related to youth. Moreover, the objective also wants to identify and possibly replicate best practices from Cluj, other cities in Romania, and even from the broader European Union.
The relationship between the private sector, local administration, other institutions, and the NGO environment is vital in an ecosystem. Through this mapping, we aim to contribute to the development of relationships between all these stakeholders.

Who is it addressed to?

1. Local Administration: Local government agencies and departments responsible for youth affairs, planning, and community development.
2. Young people in Cluj and beyond: To help them see and learn about opportunities to actively engage in areas of their needs and interest; and inspire youth in other cities in Romania, Europe and beyond to actively engage in co-creating their and our collective future.
3. Private Sector: Businesses, enterprises, and industry representatives who might be interested in youth initiatives or who might collaborate with youth organisations.
4. NGOs: Especially those that work in the youth sector or are involved in community development and engagement.
5. Other Institutions: This could include educational institutions, research bodies, or any other entities that might play a role in the youth ecosystem.
6. General Public: To raise awareness about the importance of youth, including youth workers, and the need for a holistic, collaborative approach to support and nurture the youth sector. This includes parents and families, essential to provide a nurturing environment for healthy development of young people.

On what basis was it drafted?

Lack of awareness of youth activities and their needs – Institutions, stakeholders, organisations and the citizens have poor knowledge of the activities and projects done for and by young people.

Lack of continuity in systemic change and long-term commitment – Connections are made from one individual to another, without working systemically and that suffer changes when those people are no longer connected with the organisations.

Disconnect between youth workers and youth organisations and stakeholders – While the occupation of youth workers is slowly gaining trust and acknowledgement, this is a slow process and relevant stakeholders are not connected with the experts and even discredit the field.

Lack of collective vision of institutions working with youth – Although formally established, the Consultative Council for Youth in Cluj is not a functional council yet, youth are not involved in decision making and there is not enough funding for the youth sector and supportive social infrastructure.

When?

We began working on the project in November 2022, when a mixed team was formed. This team went through numerous meetings, reflection sessions, and brainstorming sessions. These efforts culminated in several focus groups with young people and representatives of institutions from the Cluj metropolitan area. Phone calls and emails were made to collect data, and it all concluded with the collation of all the information into this report.

What methods were used?

The methods used to understand the enabling environment impacting youth in the Cluj Metropolitan Area included:
1. Desk Research: This involved a systematic and comprehensive review of existing
literature, public policies, reports, studies, and any other relevant documentation.
This method helped in understanding the broader context, existing frameworks, and
historical data related to youth in the Cluj Metropolitan Area.
2. Quantitative Research – Survey:

Instrument: The primary tool for this method was a questionnaire, developed collaboratively. Questionnaires are structured tools that help in collecting numerical data that can be statistically analysed.

Purpose: The aim was to gain a broad understanding of youth organisations in the Cluj Metropolitan Area and their activities. The data gathered from the survey fed into a mapping inventory, which was central to the entire mapping process.

3. Qualitative Research – Focus Groups:
Purpose: Focus groups were discussions involving a small group of participants. They were used to gather in-depth insights, perspectives, and nuanced information that might not be captured through quantitative methods alone.

Target: The focus of these discussions was young organisations from the Cluj Metropolitan Area. These sessions allowed for deeper exploration into the activities, challenges, aspirations, and perspectives of these organisations.

4. Qualitative Research – Individual Interviews:
Purpose: Independent of the qualitative research among organisations, we also wanted to understand the perspective of youth workers who had received training in this field.

Target: The interviews were conducted with representatives of atypical youth organisations with a rich history of good practices. The intention was to highlight and promote these best practices through our mapping project.

In essence, a combination of desk research, quantitative surveys, qualitative focus groups, and individual interviews were employed to provide a comprehensive view of the youth landscape in the Cluj Metropolitan Area.

What is the typical profile of youth organisations?
● Age Group Focus: Youth organisations in Cluj target the demographic defined in Romania as ages 14-35, further segmented into pupils, students, and young professionals & families.
● Activities and Focus: These organisations emphasise civic participation, leaning into both formal and non-formal education methods. Their primary areas of concentration are education, culture, and information.
● Budgetary Constraints: A significant portion of youth organisations work with a limited budget, specifically under 50,000 RON (10,114 EUR).
● Funding and Partnerships: They have diverse sources of funding but consistently prioritise building and maintaining partnerships and collaborations.

What are the specific problems they face?
● Financial Resources: A paramount challenge for youth organisations is the scarcity of financial resources. Given the youth’s potential as future nation builders, this constraint can have long-term repercussions on societal development.
● Trust in Private Sector and Local Administrations: There is an evident gap of trust between youth organisations and the private sector, as well as local administrations. Bridging this trust deficit is crucial since a strong partnership can lead to better resources and support for youth initiatives.
● Human Resources: Across the board, securing and maintaining human resources is a challenge for these organisations.
● Infrastructure and Housing: Securing suitable workspaces is problematic, compounded by the high housing costs in Cluj-Napoca.
● Recognition of Youth Workers: Youth workers seek greater recognition and support, emphasising the need for legislative initiatives.

How does this document help to address these identified problems?

● Highlighting Financial Needs: By mapping out the youth organisations, the Cluj Youth Mapping project underscores the critical need for financial backing, urging stakeholders to invest in the future.
● Promoting Trust and Collaboration: The document emphasises fostering trust and collaboration between youth organisations, the private sector, and local administrations.
● Legislative Support: The report brings to light the necessity of legislative initiatives for formal acknowledgment and backing of youth workers.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This project was developed by the Cluj Youth Federation (FTC) in collaboration with SDG Colab, as part of the OurCity living laboratory for youth wellbeing, supported by Fondation Botnar from November 2023 to September 2024. Its unique value was participatory approach throughout the project.

We would like to acknowledge and thank the following individuals and organisations for their invaluable contributions:

Core Team: Cluj Youth Federation – Tudor Ogner, Mihaela Roșu, Francesca Cristea, Paul Marc, Mihaela Andreea Apostu, Raluca Bogdan, Kinga Szekely, Vlad Andrei Cimpoeșu, Patrik Rojan, Diana Dunca, Andrei Coman, and SDG Colab – Barbara Bulc, Antonia Papiu, Ștefan Lazăr.
Youth Workers Team: Siviroveanu Vlada, Mihaela Ionela Furculiță, Sas Denisa, Petrice Simina, Biriș Carmen, Nica Hermina. Volunteers Team: David Condor, Dudulica Andreea, Ielciu Teodora, Petrenciu Alexia, Ismail Ania, Rujoiu Maria, Andreica Alexia, Bîcu Teodora-Maria, Redai David, Popa Iulia, Grama Stefan, Redai David, Lateș Andreea, Chirca Elena, Ursa Sergiu, Andreica Alexia.

Special thanks and appreciations:
Cluj-Napoca Students’ Cultural House – Flavius Milășan and Violeta Avram; Cluj-Napoca Youth Center – Florin Moroșanu and Ioana Trușan; Universitatea Babeș-Bolyai – Laszlo Peter.

We are deeply grateful to all participants in interviews and focus groups, as well as all volunteers for their dedication, support, and collaboration throughout this project.

Photo credits: Roland Vaczi, Paula Ivașcu and Gabi Șandru.
Video credits: George Kardoș

This project was generously supported by Fondation Botnar, as part of the OurCluj living laboratory initiative to collaborate for youth wellbeing.

INTRODUCTION

The first physical meeting of the Cluj Youth Federation and SDG Collab team to outline the “Cluj Youth Mapping” report at Youth Center Cluj-Napoca. Photo credit: Roland Vaczi

The purpose of Cluj Youth Mapping is to serve as an enabler to foster inclusion and agency in participatory decision making to improve wellbeing of young residents, and become a lighthouse for other cities in Romania, Europe and the world. We aim to explore good practices at the local level and to consult youth organisations so as to improve the wellbeing of young people within the cities of the future. Its three key objectives are:

PROJECT MAIN OBJECTIVES

O1. Conduct a participatory mapping study to (a) identify formal and informal youth organisations and (b) their activities in Cluj and the Cluj Metropolitan Area, and develop a publicly available living database.

O2. Conduct a mapping of the Cluj Youth Workers as one of activities under O1 (b) delivered by, with, for youth in Cluj Metro Area, aiming to understand and assess what is the impact of the current model of training and the additional steps that are needed to ensure that such training will have positive influence on the Cluj ecosystem.

O3. Conduct a mapping of the enabling environment impacting youth in Cluj Metropolitan Area. This includes key public, private and civic organisations which are championing and supporting youth and their activities in Cluj Metropolitan Area, including youth work, and beyond. And key national, local, EU policies; key research studies or reports about youth (eg. such as Romanian youth, aspirations, values and lifestyles, other more recent including Cluj Youth Profile, LEAP, activating Values in Urban Transitions etc.); and examples of inspirational best practices already existing in Cluj, other RO cities, and the EU.

METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK

Considering these main objectives of the project, we proposed a methodological mix, which consisted of four research methods. They are detailed in the following paragraphs, trying to include the expected output of our investigative efforts. We provided definitions of young people, youth organisation, youth worker, youth work and organisations supporting young people, as well as what we mean by formal organisations and informal, in the Appendix 1.

The first focus group in our research with representatives of public institutions that are involved or have attributions in the youth field. In the foreground Maria Forna – county councillor at the Cluj County Council and Flavius Milășan – director of the Student Culture House “Dumitru Fărcaș” from Cluj-Napoca, at the Cluj-Napoca Youth Center. Photo credit: Gabi Sandru

 

Policy and enabling environment research - to achieve O3

To get to know the enabling environment impacting youth in Cluj Metropolitan Area we will conduct desk research study on public policy and a quantitative and qualitative research, whose results will describe the following (O3):
➔ key public, private and civic organisations which are championing and supporting youth and their activities in Cluj Metropolitan Area.
➔ key national, local, EU policies.
➔ key gaps and opportunities in local and national policies, funding mechanism and ecosystem design.
➔ key studies or reports about young people which have a policy influence.
➔ examples of inspirational best practices already exist in Cluj, other RO cities, and the EU.

Volunteers of the Cluj Youth Federation involved in the development of interactive tools from the focus groups conducted. Photo credit: Gabi Sandru

In regards to the challenges, we would like to mention that by far the most challenging was to further encounter practical methods used by municipalities or other cities to develop young people. We strived to look up initiatives on medium and long term that were not only a punctual intervention for a specific fund or for specific authorities. A challenge that persists in the metropolitan area is the lack of youth organisations conducting volunteer activities outside the city of Cluj-Napoca. It is often difficult to reach communities in rural areas because there are no NGOs capable of carrying out such long-term interventions in those areas. The needs at the municipal level are entirely different from those in rural communities, and as such, youth public policies must be implemented differently. Local authorities must first understand that young people can be the instrument through which their community can thrive. 

We see Youth Mapping as an inclusive youth-centred participatory process within the community that would help us better understand the importance and contribution of young people to shaping the Cluj Metropolitan Area. We aim to also target in our study different partners specialised on youth with disabilities, LGBTQ, Roma, etc. about their activity in the Cluj Metropolitan Area or a specific neighbourhood, offering a sense of ownership about how they can contribute to the shaping of society, their resources, their strategy and how to further collaborate to help young people. Acknowledging the fact that the youth sector has transectorial dimension, meaning that the young people are affected by every domain in our society, we would like to put emphasis on quality learning and education, employment, mental health and wellbeing, sustainable development, results that also be encountered in the LEAP study revealing the importance of these themes and the necessity of being principle subjects addressed to the future of youth, as they are but also to offer a proper guidance in what means youth participation, empowerment and the intergenerational dialogue. These areas have also been identified in the LEAP interdisciplinary study on youth wellbeing.

Joint meeting of the Cluj Youth Mapping team to align the proposed objectives and the implementation plan. Photo credit: Roland Vaczi

It is designed as a social innovation enabling us to understand youth development and to promote the championship initiative and agency of the youth organisations and young citizens in democratic processes and decision making, by ensuring accessible open-source data with contact information. This transparent and continuous process would help us map the needs of young people and the manner in which they see the intervention in the community leading to reviewing local and national legal framework. We strongly believe that the youth mapping will be used in the policy-making process at national level as being the most comprehensive framework of the youth impact and needs in the society. Set as a legal foundation, the research can set a precedent in recognizing the active role of young people in our society and the services provided by them. Ultimately, this recognition could lead to a youth organisation funding and support for the development of the youth sector with the constant collaboration of national, regional and local authorities or institutions.

Quantitative research – survey – to achieve O1 and part of the O2

The survey is based on the questionnaire, a quantitative research tool, through which we propose to obtain an overall knowledge about youth organisations from Cluj Metropolitan Area and their activities. The survey informs our mapping inventory, which is at the heart of the mapping process.

In defining the research tool, we will initially consider a series of variables that we have already agreed in the document which describes the project deliverables (O1):

➔ names and location of these organisations.
➔ legal structure, team, main contact.
➔ geographic focus area (local – in which neighbourhoods from Cluj-Napoca, national or international.
➔ content focus areas and their key projects.
➔ estimated annual budget and budget source.
➔ relations to umbrella organisations (e.g., Cluj Youth Federation, students’ association, national organisation, or part of international network etc.).
➔ collaborations with other organisations (with the same or distinct areas of interest, with different types of visibility in local community).
➔ key local, national, or international partners.

To identify all the aspects outlined in the first objective of the project, we will also focus on the specifics and activities usually carried out by youth organisations. For this, we will use the categorization of focus areas in 11 EU Youth Goals and the LEAP study which focuses on four major areas: health, learning, agency and enabling environment. The desk research results will, also, constitute an important information source for other variables, research premises or previously conducted studies useful to our approach.

Volunteers of the Cluj Youth Federation involved in the development of interactive tools from the focus groups conducted. Photo credit: Gabi Sandru

Regarding the sampling frame for the organisations which will be included in the survey, we mention the following:

● the FTC members;
● the database resulted from the LEAP study, which will be a helpful starting point (around 700+ cases). This information will also be checked with those provided by the National Agency for Fiscal Administration, to know if the organisations are currently financially active.
● the data obtained by Com’ON Cluj-Napoca about the informal groups of young people who proposed initiatives for the local community (through the participatory budgeting process).

The survey will take place online, with the mention that where it will not be possible, we can facilitate the telephone conduction of the structured interview. We mention here that we will devote special attention to organisations that are less visible in the Cluj youth space, such as: religious groups, representatives of young people of different minority ethnicities, of LGBTQA+ groups, organisations for young people with disabilities, etc. If they are not part of the LEAP database, we will try to get to know them in two distinct ways. Firstly, using our questionnaire, we will ask the respondents about the collaborations they had with other (less visible) organisations. In addition, we will have a series of social media posts which will encourage different types of organisations (mentioned before) to contact FTC in order to start a process of cooperation and mutual support. 

The notes in the focus groups were essential in the process of creating the Cluj Youth Mapping report, a process in which youth workers of the Cluj Youth Federation and volunteers from the same structure took part. Photo credits: Gabi Sandru

A secondary deliverable (for O2) in this stage of the research will be an analysis with the aim of understanding and assessing what is the impact of the current model of youth training in Cluj Metropolitan Area. This component of the mapping will develop a publicly available living database as part of the mapping study, including:

➔ areas and distribution of social practice (e.g., social, cultural, educational, environmental
and/or political nature).
➔ organisations involved in the provision of training of youth workers.
➔ recipients of youth work services.

The project design methodology includes the development of an inventory framework or inventory skeleton, which represents the basis for the mapping. It includes different data categories, and structure of the database as a backend of the project. The inventory is a key element used in the mapping implementation, analysis and synthesis of data in the second phase of the project. Finally, we are going to visualise gathered information in creative and aesthetically appealing ways, which will be user friendly for citizens. For this we are able to use different map visualisation tools and design an interactive database. In order to always keep the data updated in the inventory and for the resulting map, we created a community of active young people from Cluj-Napoca.

Analysis of the implementation plan and setting new deadlines. Photo credit: Roland Vaczi

We began this process by launching a call to action for community building (and we further plan to maintain it in the future). In this way, the presence in the community will also be influenced by the involvement in the constant transmission to FTC of new information related to the activities of the organisations over time.

Qualitative research based on focus groups – to achieve O2 and part of the O1

Focus groups with youth organisations members and representatives In order to obtain in depth information about the young organisations from Cluj Metropolitan Area, we conducted some focus groups, to capture the following aspects:

➔ their vision and mission, or if available dreams, for young people in Cluj and Cluj future (O1).
➔ their needs and willingness to connect and work in partnership with other groups on
specific projects (O1).
➔ additional steps that are needed to ensure that the future youth training will have a
positive influence on the Cluj ecosystem (O2).

Focus group with representatives of student organisations from Cluj universities. Photo credit: Gabi Sandru

Depending on the results of the survey we conducted at the level of the Cluj Metropolitan Area, we outlined several categories of organisations, depending on their specificity (purpose, target public, legal structure, etc.). Subsequently, we ensured that in focus groups we will have participants from all these types of organisations.

A distinct section of the focus groups was a participatory mapping session, through which we want to offer a safe space for all organisations (regardless of the visibility level they have in the local public space) to represent themselves and expose to others their limits, needs and plans. The dimensions we have included in the participatory mapping exercises are: (1) the size of the organisations, (2) their field of activity, (3) the geographical area in which organisations operate, (4) their collaborations with others, and (5) the current and future perceived impact in the community.

Approximate number of group interviews: 3-5, depending on the selected variables for clusters.

Focus groups with qualified youth workers

Francesca Maria is part of the Cluj Youth Mapping research team, presenting the first draft of the document at the second edition of OurCluj MeetUp, at the first edition of the Cluj Youth Event. Photo credit: Roland Vaczi

Independent of the qualitative research among organisations, we also wanted to understand the perspective of youth workers who have received training in this field. Thus, with the help of the National Authority for Qualifications, as well as with the help of organisations that have been involved in these types of training (which are already known by the Cluj Youth Federation members), we aimed to select some participants and include them in focus groups, to find out their experiences and their needs for the future activities in which they will be involved (O2).

An approximate number of group interviews: 1-3, depending on the number of youth workers trained, or other variables of interest for our study.

Qualitative research based on interviews – to achieve part of the O2

The fourth research method we proposed in this project is also qualitative, but it is based on individual interviews. These were done with representatives of atypical youth organisations with a rich history of good practices, which we wanted to popularise through our mapping project. We thus wish to know (O2):

➔ their current position.
➔ the impact they managed or didn’t manage to achieve.
➔ their needs to achieve impact.

Bianca Bioșa from EvoCareera facilitating a workshop at the Cluj Youth Event. Photo credit: Paula Ivașcu

With the help of these interviews, we can explore and deepen one or more cases of youth organisations that carry out activities or projects in different neighbourhoods of Cluj-Napoca.

An approximate number of interviews: to be discussed, depending on the number of organisations we want to popularise.

This section was completed by the desk research phase with key learnings and best practice analyses from other Youth Workers Networks (e.g., Bucharest, Timișoara), and best practices in EU (O2).

The two research methods were used complementary because, on the one hand, with the help of the survey, we wanted to have an overall knowledge of as many youth organisations as possible, and on the other hand, we proposed to have an in-depth understanding through interviews (individual and group) of various actors in the field.

Thus, we received from the respondents by completing the online questionnaires a series of quantitative data, very useful to define a database structure that was later used in the mapping process. The advantage, therefore, was in obtaining a consistent volume of descriptive data for an extended sample of youth organisations. We aimed to build a sample as close as possible to an exhaustive one, but perhaps more important than this aspect was the exercise itself that we carried out together with the representatives of the organisations: expressing and popularising our desire to know their work and the enthusiastic way in that we were given responses to our invitations. Hopefully in the future, updating and expanding the database will be an easier process thanks to the steps we’ve already taken now.

In addition to the survey, the qualitative methods used created a favourable context for approaching young people, addressing topics centred on exploring the internal motivations for their work, the difficulties encountered, the needs they have, as well as thoughts for the future. These were vast topics that required a qualitative intervention that allowed the interviewees to express themselves at their leisure. Some of the discussions had sensitive content that could hardly have been captured by the answers to a questionnaire. 

Young people from Cluj involved in workshops within the Cluj Youth Event. Photo credit: Paula Ivașcu

The initial desk research outlined the general framework in which we conducted the study to better understand the youth framework by comparing national – European levels and encountering practical initiatives done to enhance youth participation. By joining the desk research to the two previously discussed methods, we provided the study with a methodological mix that aimed at a complex approach, aimed at enhancing the continuities between the research methods and mutually blurring as many of the limits of use as possible.

RESEARCH RESULTS

Policy research

We will guide our research by cross-referencing the European and national youth policy framework such as the European Union Youth Strategy 2021 -2027 with its additional European Youth Goals under the auspices of three principles `Engage. Connect. Empower`. Together with the Council of Europe Youth Strategy Sector 2030, these two have represented an important pillar of the development of youth policy in Europe.

The former EU Youth Strategy 2010 – 20183 – An EU Strategy for youth `Investing and Empowering`was shaped immediately after the 2008 economic crisis and it had 8 broad fields of action. In the
centre of the strategy was the young people as a resource to the society, especially the economic one. Consequently, emphasis was put on diverse forms of employment, job opportunity and the skills and qualifications for the labour market. Let us not forget that programmes such as Youth Guarantee and the European Skills Agenda were shaped in direct connection to this strategy.

In 2018, the new EU Youth Strategy was adopted under the auspices of the Presidency of the Council of Austria. Two years before this, in June 2016, the United Kingdom and Northern Ireland, the Brexit Referendum took place and with it, the rise of extremism and nationalism entered into a new dimension. The EUYS 2019-2027 therefore had to put the young people as agents of change in the European Union, to bring them closer to the EU (for example EU Youth Goal 1 – `Connecting EU with Youth`). It envisages young people as `architects of their own lives`.

The EU Strategy focuses more on the problems youth are facing in the EU identifying possible solutions for the general framework policy, while the Council of Europe focuses on shaping a systemic environment in the youth sector. Both strategies were the product of a large system consultations with the young people.

The Council of Europe Youth Strategy Sector 2030 has as main focus creating an ecosystem for the youth sector, one that was governed by the Council of Europe’s values (human rights, democracy and the rule of law), under the seven key principles mutual respect and trust, inclusiveness, sustained commitment, participation, equity, transparency and collaboration. The priorities of the strategy are: revitalising pluralistic democracy, access to rights, living together in peaceful and inclusive societies and youth work. 

For the states that are members of both the European Union and Council of Europe, the strategies might be seen as complementary. Both place the young people in the heart of shaping Europe and, if we dare say it, give the necessary recommendations to member states to empower young people with instruments and opportunities in order to play the role of equal partner.

The differences lie in the core of the Institutions. While the Council of Europe Youth Sector Strategy emphasis the role of Council of Europe in safeguarding rights and democracy, the EU’s approach is based more on the challenges young people face and it is made congruently with the funding programmes so as to measure the results in diminishing the problems ayoung person can face in different moments of his/her life.

The Council of Europe has a unique system of `co-management` where decisions are made jointly by representatives of youth organisations and governments. Participatory governance by young people is thus considered to legitimise the implementation and outcomes of youth policies. The system has been referred to as a model and many youth organisations try to advocate for it in relation with the local and national authorities.

When we refer of youth policy within the United Nations, we cannot refrain from making a reference to the UN Security Council Resolution 2250 on Youth, Peace and Security (2015), recognizing the importance of young people’s role in international peace and security. It is stipulated that `youth should actively be engaged in shaping lasting peace and contributing to justice and reconciliation` under five pillars of involvement: participation, protection, prevention, partnerships and disengagement and reintegration. According to this resolution, member states are urged to consider `ways to increase inclusive representation of youth in decision-making at all levels in local, national, regional and international institutions and mechanisms for the prevention and resolution of conflict, including institutions and mechanisms to counter violent extremism`. This resolution was the greatest sign that young people should be considered as equal partners in the most important processes in the global areas: peace and security. Moreover, the resolution asks the member states to `to increase, as appropriate, their political, financial, technical and logistical support, that take account of the needs and participation of youth in peace efforts, in conflict and post-conflict situations`. At the same time, the resolution requests the Secretary-General to carry on a study `on the youth’s positive contribution to peace processes and conflict resolution, in order to recommend effective responses at local, national, regional and international levels` and to further present the results in the Security Council.

Nevertheless, we aim to intertwin the European Goals with the Agenda 2030 and subsequently with the Sustainable Development Goals. We believe that by connecting the two sets of goals, we can better understand the impact of young people at European and global levels. Romania as the first country to adopt a Youth Goal within its Presidency to the Council of EU in JanuaryJune 2019, `Quality Employment for All`. Not to mention that the European Youth Goal No. 11 `Youth Organizations & European Programmes` represents an objective primarily developed for the European Youth Capitals where Cluj-Napoca holds its position from 2015 as the sole city in Romania who has ever achieved this performance and by receiving the Charlemagne Youth Prize at national level in 2015.

It is difficult to comprise all the EU Youth Policy, but we shall explore the other pillars whenshaping the Youth policy ecosystem.

The European Pillar of Social Rights was set in 2017 and it contains 20 principles for fairer and more well-functioning labour markets as well as good welfare systems for the benefit of all
Europeans. The Action Plan that lasts until 2030 stipulates that Member States should:

● Include in their national plans strengthen growth potential, job creation, social and institutional resilience, youth and children policies,
● Tackle youth unemployment through the Youth Guarantee and integrate young people on the labour market.

Even though there are 8 stages of participation and in spite of the efforts of the youth sector to better connect young people to the decision-making process, youth tokenism seems to be
visible more than ever. Youth participation has to be meaningful and it should involve young people in the life and development of the community. If participation is not done properly, it may damage the trust of young people in the local institutions and stakeholders.

In Romania, more than 2585 events (out of 12403 events in total made in or by member states) were made by the youth organisations in Romania from their own resources, being the country that was on the first country ranking in the number of events for the European Year of Youth. More than ever, or emphasised due to the consequences of the pandemic, tokenism took over the public area. Youth is referred to as`the future`, not the present, this might be translated into `when young people will grow up, they will be considered partners, but not at the moment of present, when they are still considered young people’. This ultimately, young people may feel demotivated into believing that access to participation in the decision-making process is restricted.

For example, in Cluj-Napoca was held the biggest Youth event in the country: the Youth Summit 7.0 – Roots, that consisted in 3 days of activities with more than 400 young people and youth workers engaged. lt was a participatory exercise in which the young people could enter into direct dialogue with the decision-makers at local (AJOFM, CCS) and national level (Secretary of State on Youth, Secretary of State on Agenda 2023, State Councilor on Sustainable Development, State Councilor on Social Community responsibility, etc.). At the same time, young people benefited from 43 activities made by the youth NGOs, sustainability NGOs, influencers, journalists and representatives of the business environment.

This is the reason why, within the most important process of citizens’ consultation process – Conference on the Future of Europe (COFOE), a Youth Test was proposed. The proposal aims for each and every initiative at the European level to have youth consulted on the possible output. It is also important to mention that one third of the participants all over the European Union were young people.

#Vote16 started to be an important movement in the youth sector in the last years. Why isthat? Young people do not feel seen or heard anymore, especially when it comes to important decisions. Most countries consider young people being able to be responsible for their actions in the society at 16 years old, so why not be able to vote at the same age? Lowering the age or the local, national and European elections is one of desiderate of the youth organisations and young people. This way, they will count more in the electoral programmes and therefore in the eyes of decision-makers. According to the European Youth Forum (YFJ), two-thirds of the young people aged 16-30 who were eligible to vote, have voted in the European elections. Voter turnout among 16 and 17-year-olds was actually greater than voter turnout among 18- to 24-year-olds, according to both the Scottish referendum (2015) and the Norwegian trial (2011). Voting is a fundamental right and it is the core mechanism for strengthening democracies. Young people are significantly underrepresented, which makes the representation issue worse. 

Representativeness in the decision-making process:
● Only 5% of parliamentarians in Europe are below 30 years old
● Worldwide, only 2.8% of parliamentarians are under thirty

Countries where the voting age was lowered at 16 or 17 years old:
● Austria (all elections);
● Malta (all elections);
● Estonia (local elections);
● Scotland (Scottish elections);
● Wales (Welsh elections);
● Germany (local elections in some Länder);
● Greece, people can vote at age 17;
● Germany is also moving to lower the national voting age, with some German states already including 16-year-olds on a local, regional level and European level;
● In Ireland, the proposal is under debate, where a Citizens’ Assembly in 2018 voted 80 percent in favor of vote at 16.

Another mechanism for consulting Young People is the EU Youth Dialogue that basically led to the creation of the EU Youth Strategy. Each TRIO on the Presidency of the Council of EU consults young people in respect to some themes from the EU Youth Strategy such as `Space and Participation for all` (Objective no. 9 from the Strategy – delivered by Germany, Portugal and Slovenia). It is very important to mention that the 11 EU Youth Objectives lie in the conclusions of the EU Youth Dialogue VIth Cycle and it is mentioned that these conclusions even though it is recommended that member states and the European Commission to bear these in mind when shaping policy-making or programmes, they are not legally binding. For the last few cycles, Romania always reached top 3 regarding countries that have consulted
young people on these themes. Unfortunately, all the efforts of reaching young people were made by the National Working Group on the EU Youth Dialogue (6 youth and students organisations) only from their resources.

The 7th cycle national report consulted 1942 young people on Quality Employment for All, Youth Work and Opportunities for young people in the rural area. Young people responded specifically emphasising their needs and resources14. The 8th cycle national report consulted 2089 on the subject `Space and Participation for all`15. Unfortunately, none of the proposals of the young people were transformed into public policy, nor concrete engagement over them was made. This, and due to the fact that the Ministry does not cover the expenses of the youth organisations (nor logistical, material or human resources) and the lack of constant involvement of the personnel, the manner in which the 9th cycle will be conducted is not clear.

In September 2021, during the State of the Union speech, Ursula von der Leyen announced that 2022 would be the European Year of Youth as a tribute for the young people who have postponed their lives and have actively involved in managing the pandemic voluntarily. At the European Union, 2022 had to encompass 4 objectives (green and digital transition, active and engaged citizens, opportunities for young people and youth perspective in EU policies). In Romania, the youth sector has added a fifth objective through an amendment referring to `supporting young people coming from the armed conflict areas in Ukraine`. The European Parliament has proposed the extension of the European Year of Youth until May 9, 2023, without affecting the implementation of 2023- European Year of Skills. The European Parliament stated under the same resolution that it regrets the lateness of the European Commission’s decisions that have been slowing the activities.

At the same time, within the Multiannual Strategic Framework of the Romanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, youth being connected with the SDGs is a priority especially when it comes to promoting and involving them in the decision-making process. Moreover, we would like to also have a special mention of the `intergenerational dialogue`, the priority of the Czech Presidency to the Council of EU July-December 2022 as we believe that this concept is relevant in closing gaps at generational level between different types of stakeholders. This concept refers to the capacity of bringing people of different age, background and geographical zones to construct upon building the community. The Council of Ministers on Youth adopted Conclusions on Promoting the Intergenerational Dimension in the Youth Field to Foster Dialogue and Social Cohesion they refer to promoting dialogue, solidarity and equity through the provision of youth work and in the design and implementation of youth policies from the local to the European level.

1. Funding
A. At European level

We will refer to this chapter to funds specifically for the youth sector and other funds that are not addressed only to the youth sector, but are also used in doing youth activities.

i. Funds for Youth available through the Multiannual Financial Framework 2021-2027

● Erasmus+
● European Solidarity Corps
● Erasmus for Young Entrepreneurs

For all of these, the EU funds are used to support the strategic planning and vision, human resources for youth activities (youth workers, youth services and projects), but the youth structures (youth NGOs, public authorities and private) are not financed directly as a budgetary line – it is more like a consequence for the funding of the youth activities.

What are the policy sectors and subjects that can receive funding throughout these funds for young people?

Education;
● Employment and entrepreneurship;
● Culture and arts;
● Health, sports and wellbeing;
● Climate and environment protection;
● Volunteering;
● Digital transformation.

ii. Funds that are not made specifically for the youth sector, but that can be accessed by it:

European Social Fund +

The Member States can decide to allocate funds for youth, more specifically for human resources for youth activities (youth workers, youth services and projects). As for the funding for youth structures, this is only a consequence of the funding for youth activities. These funds encompass education, employment and entrepreneurship, but member states can decide to allocate funds for social inclusion for young people at the same time.

Funds for regional development and cohesion:

European Regional Development Fund – aims to balancing regional disparities to encourage investments in a more connected, intelligent, environmentally friendly,
and socially engaged Europe.;
Cohesion Fund – provides funding for environmental projects and trans – European transportation infrastructure networks.;
Just Transition Fund – assists the regions most impacted by the shift towards climate neutrality in order to prevent regional inequalities from rising.

All the funds depend directly on the willingness of the member states to allocate funds for youth infrastructure (youth centers, friendly spaces to engage young people, mobile and virtual spaces), education, employment and entrepreneurship, and social inclusion for young people.

Regarding the funds mentioned above, Cluj-Napoca is on the North – Western ax of the program and in terms of priorities regarding the youth sector the following have been underlined for the region:

● Leisure and tourism centers are insufficient and inadequate as in the North – Western region we can encounter 10 leisure centers, 5 of them being camps. This is the reason why one of the objectives is to improve the leisure infrastructure for young people. It will increase the role of tourism within the economic development, social inclusion and innovation. It is stipulated within the program that the leisure centers have to maintain the youth children activities.
● Through this fund, the interventions for the establishment / development of education centers for young people in areas with applicability of high technology (robotics, bio-/nano-technologies, micro-/nano-electronics, electric machines) will be supported.

The program for the North-Western ax received 1,194 billion EUR. It is important to mention that centers from above are not exclusively youth centers.

Fonds supporting rights, values and the rule of law>

● Citizens, Equality, Right and Values programme (CERV),
● Justice Programme, Internal Security Fund,
● Asylum Migration and Integration Fund (AMIF).

These funds enter into a special category being funds that can be used for young people in fields such as strategic vision and planning and the social inclusion of young people, even though there is no special allocation dedicated for youth.

Sectoral funds:

● Creative Europe,
● EU4 Health,
● Programme for Environment and Climate Action (LIFE).

These budgetary lines have the aim to fund culture and arts for youth. At the same time, can be used for young people even though they have no special allocation for young people in fields such: health, sports, wellbeing, environment and climate protection. Although there is no specific reference of the allocation of youth in terms of strategic planning and vision, but also education, Horizon Europe can be utilised for youth.

Rural Development Fund is to be used as a fund for youth in employment and entrepreneurship and social inclusion.

EU funds for non-Member states – NDICI – Global Europe can be used for youth in segments such as strategic vision and planning for youth sector, education, employment and entrepreneurship, social inclusion, culture and arts, health, sport, wellbeing, climate and environment, volunteering, digital transformation, even though there is no special mention regarding youth allocation.

Besides the regular index of funds for the 2021-2027 Multiannual Financial Framework, a new fund was created: #NextGenerationEU. In comparison to the Multiannual Financial Framework, the Next Generation EU funds last until 2026.

After the outburst of the pandemic, within the RRF Mechanism – Recovery and Resilience Facility, the European Parliament and European Commission recommended member states to include a youth pillar with adequate funding and policies. Under the package of `EU Next Generation`, the European Parliament advised under a report that all the six pillar (one of them being: `policies for the Next Generation, taking into account the objectives of the European Skills Agenda, the Youth Guarantee and Child Guarantee`), every member stat should allocate at least 7%19. Romania had in the Spring of 2020 a proposal of a youth pillar, but in the end, the Government decided not to include the youth pillar. For the package that was presented, for the first time, the operational grants for youth organisations were mentioned, participatory budgeting, financing youth centers, and other policies that aimed the funding of the youth sector not only punctual as `project based`. The official reason addressed was that the funds are limited and the funds for youth can be also translated through the funds for labour, education, environment or other aspects. Theoretically, one might say yes, the young people are also affected by this but not investing in the youth agency and participation is conducting young people not to have any sense of belonging to the community. Or any sentiment that connects them to the city, region, country. The majority of states within the EU have allocated funding from this mechanism only for the youth infrastructure (youth centers, youth camps, etc.).

B. At local level

Cluj Napoca was the first city in Romania to have ever applied the Participatory Budgeting, firstly on Youth due to the Cluj Napoca European Youth Capital 2015. COM’ON Cluj-Napoca 20(Participatory Budgeting on Youth) came as an innovation aiming to serve basic aspects of young participation as part of informal groups, their active contribution to the community and their participation in the decision-making process through direct democracy. The 2015 edition aimed to prove how co-financing and partnerships for this kind of initiative can be put in practice: how public institutions can co-fund projects from EEA Grants, on how bank can give a credit line in order to provide pre-financing for informal groups and how other parts can provide co-funding for resources coming from informal groups and public budgets. The project was conducted by the PONT Group and it was organised regularly. In 2022, COM’ON Cluj conducted 35 events, actions and campaigns implemented by young people. Following the 8,300 votes, 35 initiatives proposed by 22 groups of 103 young people from the city were financially supported with a maximum of 4,500 lei/initiative by the Cluj-Napoca City Hall and Local Council and BCR and were implemented between 1 August and 20 November 2022, both in the city and online21. Cluj-Napoca was the first city of Romania to implement a process of Participatory Budgeting, a model followed by 40 other localities in Romania.

The synthetic report of the principal results of COM’ON 2015-2022 is based on a sociological research for the target groups that initiated the process, social needs and projects identified the mechanism of the activities and the place, etc. The participation of young people (here we refer only to the initiatives submitted for approval) has varied, but it was observed that starting from 2016 has decreased (in comparison to 2015) until it reached a minimum in 2021 in the pandemic period. In 2022, the number of initiatives submitted increased being similar to the ones submitted in 2021. The total number of initiatives submitted 2015-2022 is 919 projects, out of which 385 projects received funding. It is important to mention that the vulnerable groups are still underrepresented, but the impact of the initiatives over them shows a slow, but visible increase.

But who are the young people that take part in this project? The target groups were observed:

● the informal ones formed by 2-4 young people (usually university colleagues. neighbours, friends, etc.),
● groups coming from association/ formal NGOs that are looking to complement the organisation’s activities through the project,
● in 2020, another group was shaped: the ones of professionals that offered Com’ON the instruments to be more present in the labour market, but unfortunately the group disappeared in the last two years.

At the local level, since 2019, Fondation Botnar in collaboration with SDG Colab and local partners, supported development of OurCluj living laboratory to collaborate for youth wellbeing. This initiative prioritises youth wellbeing and social innovation, putting values of trust and care before profit, and focused on long term systems transformation instead on short term projects. Since then, over 20 social innovation projects have been developed under the OurCluj arrangement, amounting over 5 million EUR, respectively: 

research projects;
● participatory mapping projects;
● social and civic innovation projects;
● communication projects;
● learning projects;

This participatory mapping project is part of the OurCluj initiative. The OurCluj is part of OurCity global initiative to prioritise youth wellbeing in urban environments in five intermediary cities – Cluj-napoca is the only one in Europe, others include Tanga (Tanzania), Kofuridua (Ghana), Barranquilla (Colombia) and Manta (Ecuador).

The aim of the OurCluj living lab is to seed a fully locally owned living laboratory, to develop and experiment social and civic innovation that foster youth wellbeing, especially in areas identified as key priorities (education, health and mental health, social innovation ecosystems, youth agency and enabling environment). At the core will be a mode of collaborative governance where power is shared with youth. This is in development.

Informal Groups

The informal groups have submitted approximately 50-55% of the initiatives throughout the programme. They are basically a group of young people disconnected from a formal organisation. The informal groups are based on friendships, or other relationships developed throughout time in other institutions such as university (colleagues), neighbourhood (neighbours), etc. These types of groups concentrate on leisure activities or practical activities. It is important that this category is increasing and due to their personal relations, the trust between the members of the informal groups is one of the guiding principles of the group. The idea reflected by them is vague in the beginning and directly connected to their personal experience or to a curiosity. The idea is developed throughout the application process and it seeks to tackle concrete problems. The principal ways to gather the information are through a guiding person is someone from their entourage – a significant other, or informative online channels.

The activities proposed are leisure ones that allow the opportunity for self-achievement and to mobilise the community in supporting a cause. During the process, it has been observed they encounter problems such as:

● general communication,
● access to information,
● to make the members of the community sensitive towards the problem they identify,
● to increase the degree of responsibility in the community.

Due to their concrete perspective of solving a problem, they are unlikely to mobilise thegeneral public to obtain votes as the project is specifically addressed to their community.

Semi-informal groups

Even though considered informal, it is observed that it has strong ties with formal organisations. Even though they operate autonomous and independently, they might use the organisation’s resources. The members of this group have experience in managing projects which is considered their essential advantage. In their formation, their significant other can school/ university/ job colleagues, professors, mentors coming from their past experiences (NGO/ universities/ schools. etc.). The members of the teams are former colleagues, volunteers and partners, and they are connected through their vocation and responsibilities for the community mediated by the model person recognized by them.

The idea of their initiative is connected to their already existing activity. The idea is relatable to the general good and general interest in comparison to the previous group where the idea was connected to a specific community’s problem. They collect their information not only by using informative online channels or persons from the group, but they also have the filter of their professional experiences and contacts from the other activities they have developed.

The activities proposed by this group are diverse, with special emphasis on innovation. The activities represent the opportunity to connect to the general public and an instrument to make good to the community.

This group is also aware of the problems that may appear:

● attracting the general public,
● mobilising the team and the roles distribution,
● inadvertencies between planning activities and the “pace of life” of the target group
(holiday or exam period for pupils or students)
● access within public institutions (schools, etc.)

Semi-formal professional group

It is a very small group and after 2020 in decline as it appeared due to the online context created by the pandemic. One can also refer to them as `free-riders` as they are very practical and used Com’ON to consolidate their position on the labour market. The group is based on work relationships that are based on common and objective interests.

They get informed through formal channels and their colleagues. The activities of the projects are directly connected to offering knowledge throughout conferences and workshops that represent an instrument for professional advancement. They do not need any type of assistance and do not have moral dilemmas.

Com’ON therefore is seen as a brand for participatory budgeting, having a positive and efficient impact over society. It produces cultural and social capital, mobilising young people to participate actively in the community’s life. It contributes to solving young people’s problems.

Cluj-Napoca is the second largest city of Romania, a `university town` comprising the heart of 9 public and private universities. In the Babeș-Bolyai University, there is a students’ projects competition within the sphere of personal, cultural and professional development. The projects can be organised online, offline or in hybrid format and can request up to 50.000 RON (approximately 1.190 EUR). The applicants can be Student NGOs from UBB, teams of UBB students or a Council fo Students of a faculty within the UBB.

A very important theme that was discussed in 2022 in the Council of Youth Ministers is Youth Mobility and the need to reinforce the mobility of young volunteers across the European Union. One of the most emphasised challenges is the difference in administrative systems that target only a specific type of experience, age or the lack of recognition of the skills developed in that program. For example, in Cascais, Portugal, the European Youth Capital 2018, mobility was a priority of the programme. It was seen as essential in promoting social interaction and urban environment at local level. Facilitating public transportation for young people so that youth can participate in local and international activities. In Cluj-Napoca, through the LEAP study, mobility and transportation are very important in defining the perfect context of development. According to the results of the study, the urban area poses a challenge regarding the wellbeing of young people regarding mobility, more specifically the limited access to it. The following measures were recommended: increasing the use of public transport by young people such as new transportation, bicycle tracks, pilot tracks for encouraging outdoor activities, accessibility for young persons with disabilities. Of course, the core should be a direct connection with the universities to ease the students’ life. At the same time, young people should be involved in urban mobility projects that enhance safe and durable mobility behaviours. In order to easen the mobility of the students (Bachelor, Master PhD.), the City Hall of Cluj-Napoca offered a 120 travel tickets free subscription24 that can be easily accessed online in comparison to other cities of Romania that do not offer these kinds of subscriptions to students.

Now let us move towards national and local funding for activities. It important to mention that we used an average cost to approximate the RON-EUR conversion such as: 1 EUR = 4.9 RON.

At local level:
Cluj City Hall allocating money on the youth activities fund through Youth Law 350/2006 through the Local contest of youth projects

Cluj County Council budget on youth activities or made for youth

At the National level, the budget for the youth component of the Ministry of Youth and Sports (2018-2021)27 and the Ministry of Family, Youth and Equal Opportunities (2021- Present).

EEA and Norway Grants

SEE Funds are addressed to the Economic European Area to strengthening bilateral relations with the 15 beneficiary countries in Eastern and Southern Europe and the Baltic states, and it represents the contribution of Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway to reducing economic and social disparities28. Romania started receiving funds in 2007. Cluj-Napoca City Hall, through the Directorate of Social and Medical Assistance, is conducting a project „Replicable integrated interventions for inclusive housing and combating marginalisation in the Cluj Metropolitan Area – Pata 2″ – implemented with EEA funds, that seeks to target children and young people coming with disadvantaged backgrounds (disabilities, reduced opportunities, Down syndrome, etc.).

3. Volunteering, Youth programmes and programmes developed by/ for youth

Volunteering helps one develop their skills, by giving meaningful experiences and the chance to actively contribute to the community. Actually, volunteering can help to the social integration of vulnerable young people on the labour market if done properly with awareness and information campaigns. The volunteering programs are as significant in a young people’s personal and professional development as the internships, traineeships, apprenticeship or practice programs.

In Romania, although there is a legal framework based on which voluntary activities are regulated, at the national level and / or at the local level there are no support and support mechanisms for youth NGOs that work with volunteers or promote volunteering. Almost nine years after the adoption of Law 78/2014, the national strategy of volunteering has never been completed – a fact that also determines a lack of activity and the possibility of the public institutions to avoid responsibility. Some of the measures proposed by the youth sector also refer to the adoption of national strategy of volunteering, financing the promotion of the volunteering activities, budgeting and financing activities to professionalise work with volunteers in all areas, and changing the conditions for obtaining a residence permit for nonEU volunteers who carry out volunteering activities within the projects financed by the European Commission (or others funding programmes) and carried out by NGOs and/or public institutions by removing the condition whereby the volunteer must prove the financial availability of at least the average gross salary for each month spent in Romania.

In Romania, the experience and skills obtained after the volunteering programs are recognized only in the field of the graduated studies and sometimes not by every employer. On a larger scale, on the labour market, some entrepreneurs consider it a competitive advantage for young people to have volunteering experience. According to the LEAP Study, young people in Cluj-Napoca between 14 and 25 years old perceive themselves as the principal actors of change and they believe that volunteering is the best means to do so. Unfortunately, youth believes that the dissemination of volunteering programmes is low.

In Torino, Italy, one of the priorities while having the European Youth Capital title in 2010 was to create an all-service desk for informing and helping youngsters to look for international experiences and also to promote volunteering activities through communication activities and by offering support to the youth organisations active in suburbs.

Unfortunately, the volunteering opportunities do not reach many young people, especially those who have reduced income and cannot afford to enter volunteering programmes as they have to work. In particular, it is even harder for the young people coming from the rural areas, where there is not a very large variety of activities, and for sure there is no volunteering culture, and therefore the young people do not get involved so much in the life of the community. 

In the LEAP study, young people have also mentioned that volunteering might be perceived as `free work` from the ones outside the youth bubble. The volunteering culture is not
understood deeply by the society and therefore the young volunteers are not fully integrated by the society in the role of equal partners. As a measure, a programme that can certify youth training and volunteering recognized by the universities and private sector is needed. In this respect, Cluj Youth Federation is supporting the young volunteers by equivaling the practice course at the faculties that allow this. Specifically, for the ones that were involved in the volunteering projects, the organisation can attest the skills developed are equivalent to the ones needed at the beginners level in their field of activity. We must specify that due to the tasks performed by volunteers in the youth field, not many faculties or universities are willing to `allow` volunteering programs to equalise practice. This means that for part of the students, besides the organisations they volunteer for, they have to take a part time job, a full-time job, an internship or apprenticeship.

When it comes to culture, it is important to mention that the theatres from Cluj are open to empowering young talents. Each year, the Magyar Theater organises a project contest for the new generations of directors of Romania. When it comes to arts, we can also mention TIFF (Transilvania International Film Festival) that first appeared in 2002 and which is the biggest film festival in Romania. It has also a tailored programme for supporting young cineasts and the cinema industry.

One of the legacies of Cluj European Youth Capital 2015 is the UNTOLD Festival, a youth project that materialised in the biggest music festival in the world. It brings every year some of the most important and actual names in music, surpassing all expectations even from first the edition, which was awarded Best Major Festival at the European Festival Awards 2015 and Brand of The Year at the IAA Excellence Awards. It hosts every year more than 300,000 people, a very important number being internationals willing to live the experience. This festival raised the Cluj cultural life and marked it on the map of the most important international festivals. The idea was created by young people and each year young peoplebuild the unforgettable experience as volunteers or in the organising team of the ones that decide to visit Cluj-Napoca.

Regarding music, we have also to mention `Jazz in the Park`, a jazz festival that has organised more than 400 concerts since 2013 in Cluj-Napoca. The festival also includes a competition and a fund for supporting young jazz artists and for community initiatives collected through donations.

Volunteering remains the best tool to develop the personal and professional abilities, not to mention the possibilities to test different fields such as communication, public affairs, management, etc. Basically, volunteering offers one the chance to test and adapt without the fear of facing consequences. Volunteering is a safe space for all. There were several moments in the recent history when some decision makers mentioned that it is time to update the volunteering law or to connect the volunteering law with the apprenticeship and the internship one. We shall see how the law would develop in the near future.

4. Youth Work and Youth Workers

We see youth work as genuinely being the activities made with young people in order to help them develop their personal and professional skills and to improve their wellbeing. In some European countries it is an established profession, extended to the education and welfare system and in others, it is a practice separated from the national systems, put in place by volunteers. In the actual Youth Law no. 350/2006, youth work is defined as a `youth activity` that comprises every action organised with the aim to improve the necessary conditions necessary for the socio-professional integration of young people, according to their needs and aspirations.

In the youth mapping, we chose to address it from two perspectives: youth work as being made by professional youth workers defined as having a professional certificate that attest their competencies, but also the work made by pupils, students or young people for youth without having an official qualification.

Activities for and with young people should be done by specialised personnel. In Romania, there are occupational standards targeting this field for youth workers (highschool or graduate studies), youth counsellors (graduate studies), holiday center animators, socioeducational animators (Secondary education completed), community facilitators, mediators, agents information in information centers, which, unfortunately, because there are not enough financial resources and sustainable are found in the situation of not practising or carrying out project-based activities. Youth work in Romania is not totally regulated. In Romania, the profession of youth work is not officially recognized or registered as a job. This is the reason why a new legal framework is needed that can recognize youth work. Also, the youth workers present in the ConLucraTin 2.0 mentioned that the below measures are necessary to be taken: Development of new occupational standards in which to ensure balance and proportion between the level of responsibility and autonomy, the general competence of the occupation, the skills specific (personal and professional development of the young person) and, of course, knowledge and the level of required studies; establishment of new occupations (ex: youth center director) and the development of standards related occupations.

In the former EU Youth Strategy, the youth work was considered ` ‘out-of school’ education, as well as specific leisure time activities managed by professional or voluntary youth workers and youth leaders and is based on non-formal learning processes and on voluntary participation`. The youth work can be also found under the European Youth Goal no. 9 `Space and Participation for all` as the recommendation to `Ensure sustainable funding, common recognition and development of quality youth work in order to strengthen youth organisations and their role in inclusion, participation and non-formal education`.

How do young people envisage youth work in Romania? During the 7th cycle National Report on EU Youth Dialogue, young people had to respond to how the youth work should look like.

Young people believe that youth work should provide competencies related to the development of social skills and organisational/administrative, entrepreneurial and teamwork skills, create the context to meet other young people, learn to be independent and collaborate and also provide them with opportunities for personal and professional development, counselling and advice regarding the future career.

About the story of the young people involved in the Activating Values in Urban Transitions: A novel approach to urban innovation in Romania study at Cluj Youth Event. Photo credit: Paula Ivașcu

Youth workers should be inspirational and motivational role models. They should offer varied possibilities to access new learning and development contexts through which to discover themselves and improve their life experience (through increased involvement in community life, in other projects and experiences that will give them improved life skills), guidance for the future career and ways to acquire new professional experiences to help in accessing future jobs and facilitating the acquisition of attitudes of respect and assurance of equality for all. The youth worker should be empathetic, a good communicator, creative, kind, responsible, understanding, involved, sociable, a good organiser and have the necessary openness working with young people. It should inspire young people to work in a team and convey the idea of unity in the group. A person that wishes to work with young people should be a good mediator, capable of conducting the discussion in a manner in which would be beneficial for delivering information, extracting opinions and conclusions. 

The main need of young people is to benefit from the presence of competent people and communicative to give them periodic feedback. For them, any activity becomes much more constructive when they have the necessary confidence that what they do is confirmed by others. A youth worker must have experience in leadership activities, organisational management, psychology, legal field, entrepreneurship, etc. The youth worker has to have updated information regarding the current labour market and its trends. It should provide information about the opportunities available to a young person to train and gain the necessary experience in the profession someone would like to activate in.

The needs of the youth workers are appropriate training, recognition of skills, supporting the mobility of youth workers and promotion of innovative services.

Starting in December 2021, an event dedicated to the community of youth workers has been developed: Youth Workers Convention. Organised by the Ministry of Family, Youth and Equal Opportunities, Erasmus+ Agency in Romania and DEIS Association, the event aims to put in contact the youth workers in Romania and offer a safe context to exchange good practices. This event was actually the proposal of the DEIS Association that emphasised the need for youth workers to gather and discuss their needs and the solutions to the challenges they are encountering.

Following the conclusion of the Youth Workers’ Declaration in Romania from the second edition of the event, it is structured on 3 domains: Career, Activities for youth and the Legal and FInancial Framework. The youth workers needs and solutions can be found below:

Developing a national training programme that should contain initial and long life forming with an adequate set of soft, but also hard skills youth workers feel the need to develop the community, to receive support regarding the mentorship programme, funding or other in-kind help, adequate training and a needed professional standard and extension in the rural area.

The European Youth Work Agenda, derived from the EU Youth Strategy and Council of Europe’s Youth Strategy, states that the recognition of the youth activities as a distinct field of expertise, recognizing at the same time challenges such as insufficient resources, adaptability of the youth workers to the continuous changing of the society and therefore the youth, challenges that must be addressed locally, regionally, nationally and at the European level.

During the most ambitious process of consultations with the Romanian youth sector, both at individual level and at organisational level, the Youth Resolution contains practical recommendations for the youth work sector. We will emphasise the need for all the public institutions that have activities affecting young people should have special compartments for youth and employ specialised youth workers who manage the relationship with them.

Youth work is very important at local and regional levels. In February 2021, the Congress of Local and Regional Authorities adopted the report “Youth work: the role of local and regional authorities`, offering the needed tools and mechanism to strengthen the youth work. It is emphasised in the report the youth workers are important partners for public authorities and they can improve youth policies as young people are directly affected by decisions taken at local and regional levels. Youth work mediates between young people with different perspectives and helps them work together, and this is the reason why youth work is strengthening democracy. Youth work helps young people improve their skills and therefore increases the quality employment chances, improves the mental health of young people, and by this, youth work is building a stronger community for future generations.

Bianca Borota – active youth worker from the DEIS Association facilitating a workshop within the Cluj Youth Event. Photo credit: Paula Ivaşcu

The report also contains a set of recommendations for local politicians and administrators: Involve young people and youth workers in local and regional policies that impact their lives at large and youth work in particular; Provide youth workers with enough resources, such as funding, equipment, and technical support; Present information in a clear and concise way, and give examples, so that every young person can understand and take part in discussions.

By working together, youth workers and elected officials can:

Make youth work inclusive and safe by reaching out to all young people, especially those who might feel isolated or are in a difficult situation and by working towards gender equality;
● Cooperate on new local and regional initiatives to combat climate change and implement the UN Sustainable Development Goals;
● Co-create spaces for youth to come together and where local youth workers can carry out activities;
● Set concrete goals and indicators to measure the impact and quality of local and regional youth work and to understand and address potential gaps.

The report also mentions good practices at the local level. You can find them below:

In Scotland, the Rural Youth Project hosts the Idea Festivals that bring together young people from rural areas throughout Europe to share ideas, network, learn new skills, and explore ways to make rural areas more viable for young people to build their futures.

In the Danish municipality of Genofte, young people can participate in the Mobile Youth Office Project. which travels the municipality and incorporates other young people in activities and policy development. The Project has featured concerts, food trucks, workshops, and events.

In Gran Canaria, Spain, the youth organisation Nauta launched a radio broadcast initiative in order for the young people to debate and raise awareness of the opportunities of being young and European, by teaching skills on European projects.

In Turin, Italy, there is a Rainbow House (Casa Arcobaleno) which represents a safe space for all the identities to be expressed. It organises activities in particular with LGBTI youth. For example, they set up a weekly help desk for young people and their families from abroad who need to find their way around the city and make use of the city’s services.

In strong relation with the youth work there are the youth centers. To have a safe place where youth organisations and young people can develop one another is very important to the development of the city as it builds trust within members and it enhances partnerships towards different pillars of the youth stakeholders. This is how the Youth Cluj Center became reality – a space where youth activities can be held in a safe, friendly and cost-free (as long as the activities do not make profit) environment.

The youth ecosystem established in Cluj-Napoca empowers young people to lead their community starting with their organisation or informal group. The importance of the youth workers has already been emphasised in the LEAP Report where they have been recognized as the active connection between young people and stakeholders such as national or European stakeholders.

5. Future of Work

The future of work is rapidly evolving, and for young people just starting their careers, it can be difficult to predict what the job market will look like in just a few years. 2023 was designated the European Year of Skills, an opportunity that will help companies to address skills shortage in EU. It aims to promote processes as upskilling (learning new skills in your field of activity) and reskilling (learning new skills to perform in another field). The 2030 Digital Compass targets at least 80% of the adults with basic digital skills. Romania scores the last place on the Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI) 2022, more specifically Romania scores well below the EU average concerning at least basic digital skills (28% vs 54%) and above basic digital skills (9% vs 26%). In 2023, according to the Digital Decade Country Report 202331, in terms of ICT specialists and at least basic digital abilities, Romania lags far behind the EU average (54%) and the EU aim of 80% of the population aged 16–74 possessing these skills (28% vs. 54% EU average). At the same time, it is mentioned within the report that in Romania there is the highest proportions of female ICT specialists in the EU, at 25.2%32. What can be done? The report mentions that Romania should, in particular, include private stakeholders more in the creation and implementation of digital skills initiatives. Additionally, Romania needs to focus especially on attracting and keeping ICT specialists, as well as bolstering efforts for reskilling and upskilling.

Automation, RPA and Artificial Intelligence will become the core of the future labour market being used as instruments in diverse fields of activity. The future of work would eventually create new professions that can keep up with the emerging technologies of the future.

Following the announcement of the President of the European Commission Ursula in her 2021 State of the Union address, a resolution on Empowering European Youth has been promoted to start its course in the European Parliament in late October in 2021. The resolution contains 4 subdivisions: Investing in the young generation, Labour market integration of young people, Labour mobility and skills for the future, Fighting youth exclusion and avoiding a lost generation. The Resolution has emphasised the “devastating effect on the labour and social status of young people in Europe” consisted in “substantial loss of work and income during the pandemic as a result of unemployment and reduction in working hours`. The second chapter addresses the labour market integration of young people. It is essential to mention that young people (18-24 years old) are at a greater risk of social exclusion or poverty than adults. 

It is used as a comparison between the Youth Guarantee and the Reinforced Youth Guarantee. The Youth Guarantee aims to offer a smooth transition from school to work, support labour market integration under the auspices `no young person should be left behind`. It is important to mention that the age limits from the first program to the second one changed from 25 to 29. The second chapter addresses the labour market integration of young people. In this article, the reinforced youth guarantee is stipulated and further emphasises the need for the European Commission to provide incentives to the companies in order for them to play an active role in the integration of young people into the labour market. Bearing in mind the non-satisfying results of the previous youth guarantee, the second article calls for the establishment of an EU committee for the implementation of the reinforced youth guarantee bringing together different stakeholders from civil society (youth organisations, youth representatives of the nongovernmental area) and governmental level (national authorities, decision-makers) a for sharing best practices and in order to facilitate coordination.

It is very important to say that in Romania, the funds from Youth Guarantee were not absorbed due to the fact that the Ministry of Labour delegated exclusively the County Agency for Labour (AJOFM) to go to find the NEETs and young people who needed help to find proper professional training and an adequate job. This meant that the youth organisations, youth workers or other organisations that were working directly with young people. This led to the incapacity of forming partnerships between the governmental and nongovernmental entities. Realistically, the institutions could not reach the young people in need of these opportunities as they never let organisations be part of the scheme. At the same time, the institutions were unable to provide the trainings in an adequate manner for the young people, this is the reason why many participants withdrew. The Reinforced Youth Guarantee explicitly mentions `youth organisations as partners`.

During the Youth Summit (Summitul Tinerilor) we tackled this subject with the Cluj Agency for Labour and the representative promised a better involvement of youth organisations and youth sectors in what means outreaching activities.

Actually, Cluj-Napoca is considered a `magnet for young talents`, young people under 29 years old. Cluj-Napoca also conducted the project `Cluj Future of work` that studies and tests the possibilities through which the city can prepare itself for the challenges that the future of work might bring. Bearing in mind the social and cultural aspects and the manner in which the cultural industries, the project identifies three areas of development in the Cluj: transition to the 4.0 technology, raising competitiveness and involvement in different levels of our society for the cultural industries, understanding and fundamental change proposals for organising labour in the city through work with different excluded social categories at the labour market in the present.

Recycling workshop facilitated by friends from QUB by Cluj Cultural Center in the Cluj Youth Event. Photo credit: Paula Ivașcu

IT&C, innovation, technology hub – are the best words to describe how Cluj is being shaped by the young labour force. According to the Integrated Strategy of Development of the Cluj Metropolitan Area, young people in this field are recruited from the first years of college by IT companies, this situation putting universities in difficulty (approximately 1 in 5 first-year students drop out studies). For this reason, flexible measures must be thought of so that young people can have a part-time job, being conditioned, however, by the completion of studies. For efficiency, within some specially created campuses, these facilities can be thought of as a package – these are the observations and visions that need to be encompassed in future policies that set out the future of work.

How does the ideal job look like in the vision of Cluj young people? Most of the interviewed young people answered that flexibility and the constant use of their creativity are essential components. During the Cluj Youth Event (April 2023), during a training session about the Future of Work, most young people answered that the communication skills and team management will be indispensable as well as knowing how to make use of the digital tools.

According to the LEAP study33, among youth, a third feel that the local education establishments don’t provide training that meets the needs of the labour market. Among teachers and parents, approximately a third feel that the training doesn’t reflect market needs. Moreover, young people mentioned the need for labour market integration in ClujNapoca by counselling at the end of highschool and a better collaboration between universities and local administration to attract more investors in the industries fields in which universities can prepare graduates. Integration of young people on the labour market is a very important topic especially when adolescent mentioned it is one of the biggest challenges.

London has its strength in the high skills human resources, but shortfalls in intermediate and basic skills. This is the reason why London councils, sector skills councils, National Apprenticeship Service, employers group joined-up into raising the number of apprenticeships in place with many new activities taking place, such as efforts to boost the number of apprentices in the public-sector, public-sector procurement and boosting apprenticeships in non-traditional sectors.

In Germany, both Luckenwalde and Prignitz have experience in securing a skilled labour force. This is done in part through a local development strategy in Luckenwalde, a regional economic development company in rural Prignitz and creating common action plans with all relevant actors. This is connected with the metropole region’s cluster strategy which designated both localities as local growth poles.

FIX Cluj – Fund of Innovation and Experiment is a programme that helps the innovative ideas of young people from Cluj (16-26 years old) to become reality. This co-designed programme is supported by the City Hall and the County Council of Cluj-Napoca, Botnar Foundation and the Educational Cluster C-EDU and the grants can reach up to 50.000 EUR. Young people can apply with their idea, they will present it over the Demo Week 1 and 10 applications with a requested grant up to 12.000 EUR will be selected. The teams will benefit from a mentorship programme. In Demo Week 2, 4 applications with a grant up to 35.000 EUR will be selected. Talking about young entrepreneurs, part of the ones interviewed stated that they feel positively impacted by the constant performant economic context of Cluj-Napoca.

6. Environment, Sustainability and Housing

Climate Change represents a very important topic for the future generations as their right to live in a healthy environment is perished: the resources for clean water and unprocessed food are diminishing, the pollution of air is present in almost every type of city. In the light of the latest events when Russia invaded Ukraine, the prices for the electricity and gas have increased significantly and this led to young people having a difficult time to afford the housing at the same level in 2021.

Ovidiu Cîmpean – State Secretary at the Ministry of Investments and European Projects at the formal opening of the General Assembly of the Cluj Youth Federation in the Cluj Youth Event. Photo credit: Gabi Sandru

According to the Cluj Youth Profile 2020, young people decide to move to Cluj-Napoca when they begin their studies and they continue to live in the city when they find a job. The majority of young people under 25 years old decide to rent a place to live – a room in a dorm or apartments that they share with their peers. According to the Integrated Strategy for Development of the Metropolitan Area of Cluj, in comparison to other decades, the number of persons wishing to live by themselves has increased, especially when we refer to young people that have a preference for two rooms apartments that they can share. When young people reach 30-35 years old, the chances to buy an apartment have increased.

What are young people looking for when it comes to housing? They are looking to be close to the central zone, to have transport facilities (bus connection, Cluj bike), to have parks and commercial centers with shops that can answer their daily needs.

Unfortunately, even if housing represents a very important problem, the young people do not represent a priority group when it comes to the allocation of social apartments, not even the ones that leave the social protection system.

In the Governorship of Van, Turkey, the Youth Entrepreneurs Signal S.O.S for Climate Change partnership works with youth to get them involved in creating an agriculture that is environmentally conscious. They collaborate with many organisations to find agriculturallybased strategies to combat climate change.

7. Mental Health, wellbeing and health policies

Young people have been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic on a deeper level and this can be seen by correlating an increased number in mental health problems such as anxiety, depression, etc. According to the Romanian Youth Resolution 2020-2027, the regulations, initiatives or decisions that concern young people in this field are not accessible as they are not fully promoted.

The state of mind of young people is very important in the events organized by the Youth Federation of Cluj, and the Cluj Youth Event is no exception. Photo credit: Gabi Sandru

Young people in Cluj-Napoca decided that the theme of the 2023 year would be the Year of Emotional Health. At the local level, this theme will be used to develop projects and establish funding priorities. Additionally, the chosen theme will serve as a source of inspiration for all Cluj youth ecosystem actors. The voting period ran from December 21, 2022 to January 15, 2023 and it was chosen by 33,4% of voters.

In terms of the health of young people, especially when it comes to their dynamic lifestyle, it is important to mention that 50% of the of acute illness cases, especially among children and young people, are those at the system level respiratory (pharyngitis, acute tonsillitis, bronchitis, acute bronchiolitis, acute nasopharyngitis, laryngitis and acute tracheitis, viral pneumonia), followed by those of the digestive system (dyspepsia/indigestion, gastritis, duodenitis), urinary (e.g. cystitis), cardiovascular (hypertension), musculoskeletal (diseases of the spine) etc. The causes for these illnesses are diverse and can be the unhealthy diet, sedentary lifestyle, alcohol consumption, smoking, hygiene deficient and infections, physical or mental overload, risk compartments, etc. 

Interestingly enough, young people from Cluj-Napoca are careful with the periodic investigations in the public system, the private services being contracted only for certain situations. The same study shows that the transgender young people are not treated in an adequate manner within the public hospitals and they feel the need for the hospital personnel to have a better understanding of the LGBTQA+ community.

8. Youth Organizations, young people and participation

Participation at the European, National and Local authorities

What about the Cluj Youth Stakeholders Mapping?

Cluj European Youth Capital 2015 represented a shaping point for the development of the city regarding the economic, cultural and social aspects. The title helped organisations, young people’s groups and youth workers come together with the local authorities to create a program relatable to the young people in Europe. Youth organisations of Cluj-Napoca are gathered under the umbrella of the Youth Federation of Cluj.

 

We want the wishes of young people to be embodied in any of the actions taken by the Youth Federation of Cluj and further by all the actors in the youth ecosystem. Cluj Youth Event. Photo credit: Paula Ivașcu

What types of activities do young people conduct?

Young people and youth organisations use both non-formal and formal education in order to deliver knowledge and develop practical skills. How? According to the synthetic report of research for Com’ON results 2015-2022, in 2022, young people conducted their activities as workshops and conferences (24.3%), leisure activities such as sport or out-door games (18.6%) and raising-awareness and informative campaigns (12.9%). The same report stated that the types of the most common activities were meetings within the community, demonstrations (23.2% in 2015, 28.6% in 2016 and 21.5% in 2018/2019), art expositions and installations, projects and concerts (18.1% in 2015, 21.1% in 2016 and 23% in 2018/2019). Between 2020-2022, activities such as services were the most preferred: workshops and conferences or raising awareness campaigns.

In Slovenia, some municipalities organise “mayor for a day” events, when young people can put themselves in the role of mayor. By empowering them, they can present the challenges they face in their municipality and propose ways to solve them, giving local authorities insight into the issues young people face and concrete proposals on how to address them.

What about the participation of young people?

Young people must be put forward, we must trust them and their capabilities. Cluj Youth Event. Photo credit: Paula Ivașcu

The young people from Cluj-Napoca represented more than 25% of the voters for the local elections in 2020 and 40% for the presidential and European elections in 201956. The study explains that we have a constant of 100,000 young people taking part in the local elections, whereas in the general ones we have a constant group of 190,000 young people, and the trend is similar at national level. The explanation rests in the fact that the young people do not have a stable residence to vote for the local elections (students, young people coming from different parts of Romania), but they are able to vote in the presidential and European elections without the restriction of having a stable residence.

What about civic participation?

According to the Youth Cluj Profile, young people perceive it as a set of necessary andenjoyable activities for them and they often get involved in multiple civic initiatives. The ones that are not involved motivate this as a consequence of the lack of free time or a cause that can offer them motivation to take part in it.

9. Youth and the cities

Shaping the future of our community can be done by empowering young people to show us the city through their eyes to assess the opportunities, potential and challenges of youth. The results of the youth mapping will inspire confidence and hope, cultivating trust between young people and the other stakeholders of the community to harvest the co-creation mechanism within all their work. It is also aimed as a moment of reflection where the youth sector along stakeholders (decision-makers, representatives of the public and private area) about the critical issues and challenges, opening up subject that are not easily discussed such a stagnating point, the need to take action and the empowerment of young people and youth organisations.

The feeling of belonging to one or multiple communities that gravitate around young people is present and valued at a large scale. Young people are more likely to enjoy their daily life when they are involved in an ecosystem that encourages them to personally and professionally develop and support the communities. The young people that have participated in a focus group within the study stated that the local authorities should offer more support to the smaller communities with limited resources.

When talking about the LGBTQA+ and magyar ethnic community, besides the feeling of belonging, the feeling of acceptance was mentioned as an essential need. They are perceived differently by society and the subject of discrimination might be a consequence of the different perception. Within the focus groups, the magyar ethnic young people stated that they do not feel discriminated, but they might encounter people with some less empathetic attitudes60. The LGBTQA+ respondents stated that they did not encounter situations where they felt directly discriminated against, but there have been less pleasant situations that had as a cause their sexual orientation.

Where do young people conduct youth activities within the cities? The synthetic report of research for Com’ON results 2015-2022, shows that young people use for typical activities the streets of the city during 2015-2019, in the following years the activities switch to online due to the effects of pandemic (32,9% in 2020 and 20,9% in 2021), in 2021-2022, one might observe that the favourites places are the closed or semi-private ones, especially companies’ and organisations’ offices (27,1% in 2022 and 23,3% in 2021), but also spaces offered by the local authorities and universities.

Therapy with puppies can bring many benefits, and we discussed it at the Cluj Youth Event, we thank the Dog Assist Association for the collaboration. Photo credit: Paula Ivașcu

Opening of the General Assembly of the Cluj Youth Federation within the Cluj Youth Event. Photo credit: Gabi Sandru

One of the legacies of Cluj European Youth Capital 2015 is the Romanian Youth Capital Title62 that represents an important mechanism to empower young people to shape their cities, and for the local authorities to invest in the youth sector. The programme hosted 5 editions (Timișoara, Bacău, Baia Mare, Iași, Constanța), having the 2023 Youth Capital in Targu-Jiu, and the future one in 2024 in Ploiesti). The programmes encourage young people with initiative and youth organisations to unite their voice and resources so as to transform their city into a youth friendly one. It tackles the development of youth policies through a local youth strategy and constant dialogue with the local authorities and the private sector. The Governance of the programme encompasses:

● Romanian Youth Council, the representative structure of the Romanian youth;
● Youth Federation of Cluj, entity created in the context of European Youth Capital ClujNapoca 2015;
● The PONT Group, a youth experts’ group, the initiator of the measures’ set to prepare the Romanian Youth Capital based on the experience of Cluj-Napoca’s candidacy for the European Youth Capital 2015;
● Commercial Romanian Bank, leader of the Romanian banking system.

The results for the Youth Cluj Mapping obtained represent the strategic directions that the Cluj Youth Federation will build upon their multiannual strategy and their action plan.

Quantitative data analysis

Brief description of organisations who participated in our survey

The total number of organisations for which we obtained information about through the online questionnaire is 99. We point out that the research tool has been translated from Romanian into English and Hungarian to facilitate the involvement process of all representatives of the organisations involved in our research. Most of the questionnaires were completed in Romanian, as you can see in Figure 1.

In terms of the status of organisations about which we have collected data, we classified them as follows: youth non-governmental, that do activities for young people, institutions, companies and other types of structures. Figure 2 represents the distribution of the number of responses obtained during the data collection phase of our project, depending on the type of organisation.

We mention here that we had a response from Huedin City Hall, which although is outside of the Cluj metropolitan area, we considered it important to keep this case in our database, as an example of a municipality in Cluj County. The same situation applies to five other organisations that do activities for young people that operate outside the Cluj metropolitan area (Appendix 2). For the future, if the project is expanded to the county level, we will have the starting point consisting of the data set shared with us by Huedin City Hall and the other organisations.

For this moment, however, we have not included these cases in the total number of institutions and organisations that do activities for young people for which we presented detailed statistics in the research report.

General information about the organisations

a. Year of establishment and the team’s structure

We can see in Figure 3 that many of those who chose to complete the questionnaire are part of very young organisations, established after 2011, some of them even during last year, 2022.

Most of the institutions included in our sample were established before 2000.

Youth non-governmental organisations. As for the size of this type of organisations’ teams,we see that most of them (13) are small, up to 50 members.

In terms of how teams are structured, many of them have a formally composed Office or Board of managers and more frequently volunteers than active, full members.

Domains of interest and implemented projects

In general, most of the organisations which responded to the survey (99) have more domains of interest in which they are working (the average is over 4). The most frequent one was education (92), followed by culture (56) and information and constructive dialogue (46). The least mentioned domains of interest in which the organisations activate are quality employment for all (18), equality for all genders (21) and connecting the EU with youth (24). 

In the “other” category there are tourism, religion, innovation, art, entrepreneurship and finances.

Youth non-governmental organisations

Each of the non-governmental organisations (34) has more focuses and more domains of interest in which they activate, each organisation having on average 4 domains of interest. The organisations are most active in education (30) and culture (19) and the least preferred domains are equality for all genders (4), youth in rural areas (5) and inclusive societies (5). In the “others” category, the organisations mentioned other domains of interest, such as: entrepreneurship, human rights, student representation, drug prevention, innovation and social activities.

Each of the non-governmental and civil organisations that do activities for young people (36) has more focuses and more domains of interest in which they activate, the average is 4,85. The most prevalent domains of interest are education (33), mental health and well-being (18) and culture (16).

Other types of structures

For other types of structures (19 in total), which have no legal structure, such as the Student Buddy Council (CJE Cluj), Com’on Cluj and informal groups under it, organisations which are part of political parties or entrepreneurship students’ societies, the most frequent domains are education (18), information and constructive dialogue (12) and culture (11).

Institutions

For the institutions’ side, it can be observed that they also have as main domain of interest education (5) and culture (4), but it is important to be mentioned that there were only 8 respondents in total (Cluj Local Council, Public Service for the Administration of Cultural Objectives – Youth Center Compartment, National Anti Drug Agency, Cluj County Directorate for Sports and Youth, “Eugen Pora” High School, “Dumitru Farcaș” Students’ Culture House Cluj-Napoca, “Alexandru Borza” Technological High School and Cluj-Napoca Sports High School), so this is the reason why some domains of significant importance to young people (inclusive societies, mental health and well-being, quality of employment and sustainability) are not even mentioned in the responses.

Companies
There are only 2 companies which responded and have projects to support youth, BCR and Planetarium Cafe. They are interested in culture, connecting the EU with youth, sustainability, inclusive societies and equality for all.

Description of the projects

In general, the participants were very open and responsive to the survey offering in depth details about the project that they are conducting annually, mentioning an average of 5
projects per organisation. The target population of these projects differs according to the domain of interest of each of them. Some target high school students, some pupils and others are focusing more on university students. For example, projects that imply IT domain are targeting Technical University students and not only.

Overall, the projects are very diverse and range from education in all areas: health, financial, environment, career orientation, to cultural projects and digital areas: coding, marketing.

For example, on education and culture, which came out the most prominent answers regarding the domain of interest of the respondent organisations, some projects are: mentorship programs Thinkup Academy, Simulation of the European Parliament and Youth Speak Forum.

Youth non-governmental organisations

Each of the organisations have on average 2-3 projects which are recurrent and have become quite popular in the city and manage to gather a lot of participants every year.

The projects are very diverse and among them there were observed: national conferences, Christmas events, business and marketing education activities, blood donation campaigns, career orientation and fairs, sport activities and contests to promote an active, healthy life, summer camps for high schoolers, theatre festival for the highschoolers, hackathons, exchange programs.

For example, on education and culture, which came out the most prominent answers, some projects are: Healthcare, Education and Research Talks (HEART), Caravana FSEGA-OSE or Global Village.

Non-governmental organisations that do activities for young people

Among the topics of the projects developed, there are: the IT days, financial education, antidrug prevention campaigns, career orientations, football championships, sexual health education, Light Art festival, science days, Hungarian Film Days, Innovation Labs and Cluj Pride. For example, on education and culture, which came out the most prominent answers, some projects are: ATOM Project (financial education), The Academy of Good Deeds (Academia de fapte bune) and The Days of Science.

Compared to youth non-governmental organisations, the non-governmental organisations that do activities for young people have a wider range of people targeted. Their projects also address marginalised groups, such as hungarians and LGBTQA+ (Cluj Pride). Moreover, some of the projects were developed since the war in Ukraine started and have as a humanitarian purpose to help the Ukrainians in need (Ukrainian Hub). 

Institutions

Given that the respondents for these categories are public entities, they mostly organiseprojects regarding financing of the youth, such as: local contests for youth projects, school renovations, acquisitions of IT equipment for schools.

Moreover, they have projects which target youth well-being at the local level, for example: bullying prevention in schools, drug prevention campaigns or courses on how young people could manage emotions.

Institutions that completed our questionnaire: The Public Service for the Management of Cultural Objectives – Youth Center Department (manage Youth Consultative Council), The Student Cultural House “Dumitru Fărcaș” in Cluj-Napoca (cultural clubs), The Cluj County Directorate for Sport and Youth (not exist anymore), Cluj County Council (public contest for financing youth sector), The National Anti-Drug Agency – Prevention, Evaluation, and Drug Counseling Center (CPECA) Cluj (prevention and education), and the French Institute in Romania in Cluj-Napoca (cultural projects).

Companies

The target was to find companies which have activities for youth. Cluj has a booming business sector, both local and international, and awareness about importance of responsibly engaging with society and local environment including with young people, is slowly emerging. However, for this research we only had BCR Bank and Planetarium Cafe as respondents. In this sense, BCR has the following project: the greatest hour of financial education, which was a national project, financial education workshops targeting schools, high schools, universities and young employees, global money week, happening 1 time a year, optional for financial education in Cluj schools. Planetarium Cafe has different community events, such as concerts, activities for kids and they are the ones who offer the space usually for activities dedicated to young people.

Others

As this is one of the most diverse categories, the organisations are having a lot of different projects which focus on: art, debate theatre club, bootcamps, shadowing USR Cluj parliamentarians, entrepreneurship lessons, recycling activities, educational programs and even blood donation campaigns.

Budgets and financing sources

1. Youth non-governmental organisations

a. Estimated budget for the last year (2022)

Based on 34 out of 122 responses received to the question about the 2022 annual budget estimate, we can highlight the following:

→ the average value of organisations budget is 72,382 RON (14,653 EUR);
→ 5% trimmed mean63 is 53,625 RON (10,856 EUR);
→ Maximum amount of declared budget: 600,000 RON (121,463 EUR) Cluj-Napoca Hungarian Student Association;

Regarding the distribution of organisations according to the budget they had last year, most of them, according to data from Figure 6, had up to 50,000 RON (10,114 EUR).

b. Frequently accessed funding sources for the carried-out projects

The most frequently mentioned sources of funding for projects carried out by organisations were: donations (19), 3.5% of the income tax (14), private funds (12), City Hall (11), Cluj County Council (8) and sponsorship (5). We see, therefore, that most sources are external to organisations and depend on the actions of third parties: persons, legal entities, or public authorities.

2. Organisations that do activities for young people

a. Estimated budget for the last year – allocated to youth projects

The analysis of the 36 answers related to the question about the budgets allocated last year to youth projects shows that, on average, they were 745,540 RON (152,151 EUR). If we eliminate the outliers, the trimmed mean becomes 566,650 RON (115,642 EUR). The interval of variation for the declared organisations budgets is 200 – 6,500,000 RON (41 – 1,314,911 EUR).

Figure 6 shows a majority (15 out of 36) of organisations with budgets allocated to youth projects of up to 100,000 RON (20,229 EUR). Another 9 respondents said that in the organisations they represent the amounts they distribute for this purpose are between 100.001 – 1,000,000 RON (20,230– 202,299 EUR).

b. Frequently accessed funding sources for youth projects

Unlike youth organisations, those carrying out activities for young people have private funds as their main source of funding, these being mentioned 23 times by respondents. In addition to these, other ways in which projects are frequently financed are through: donations, 3.5% of the income tax, european funds and City Hall.

3. Other types of structures

a. Estimated budget for the last year
Seven of the structures about which we obtained data in our survey had budgets for 2022less than 10,000 RON (2,023 EUR), the other six exceeding this amount. For this question,four of the respondents chose not to provide details and one of them stated that they had no budgets for the last year of activity.

b. Frequently accessed funding sources for the carried-out projects – donations (5), specific partners, depending on the project (4), City Hall (3), private funds (3), contributions of members (2), Cluj County Council (2), other sources such as: political parties, 3.5% of income tax, commercial activity, subsidies, sponsorships, etc. The informal groups also mentioned in this context The Ministry of Family, Youth and Equal Opportunities, and Com’ON Cluj-Napoca as specific sources for funding.

4. Institutions

a. Estimated budget for the last year – allocated to youth projects

Cluj County Council allocates annually from its own budget amounts to finance projects of non-governmental organisations in Cluj County. Last year, 900,000 RON (182,064 EUR) was allocated for youth and socio-educational projects. The Youth Compartment from the Public service for cultural objectives administration declared the amount of 100,000 RON (20,229 EUR) allocated for 2022.

Regarding the financial situation of companies, we do not have enough data about their budgets allocated to youth projects, or more specifically, for youth-related projects in the Cluj metropolitan area.

Collaboration with others and umbrella organisations

Youth non-governmental organisations

Out of 34 youth non-governmental organisations, 31 of them are part of umbrella organisations. Some of them (25) are even part of more umbrella organisations. The most frequently mentioned are: Cluj Youth Federation (FTC), The Union of Romanian Students (USR), The Consortium of Students’ Organizations (COS), National Alliance of Student Organizations from Romania (ANOSR) and AIESEC.

Regarding partnerships, out of 34 organisations, 32 have on average 3 partnerships, some even over 20 with Cluj Universities/Faculties (FSPAC FSE, FCIC, FSEGA, Transylvania College, BBU), Cluj Napoca City Hall, Cluj County Council, BCR, Transilvania Bank.

Non-governmental organisations that do activities for young people

Out of 36, 33 non-governmental organisations have more diverse partnerships and collaborations with different entities, such as: FTC, CCC, Minte Forte, Patrir, Preventis, Thinkup Academy, DGASPC Cluj or C-EDU. 26 out of 36 organisations have a youth protocol.

Others

Out of 19 organisations which have no legal structure, such as the Student Buddy Council (CJE Cluj), organisations which are part of political parties or entrepreneurship students’ societies, there are 10 of them which are part or umbrella organisations, while 9 are not part of any. Concerning the partnerships, out of 19 organisations, only 1 does not have any partners, and the rest have collaborations with universities, student organisations or with different political parties.

Companies

Out of the 2 respondents to this category, BCR has collaborations with- all Cluj NGOs starting with Universities, Interact Cetatuie, GROW Project, SAS, Parents’ Association from Floresti, DOFE, working with a youth protocol.

Cafe Planetarium has as partners the following: KMDSZ, PONT Group, UBB STUD, Asoc. Stud. Drept, BEST, Hervay Klub, UBB Cluj, ÉRTED, Asco. Tinerii Liberali, RMKT, ISN Erasmus, OSUBB, Org. Stud pentru Natura, Org. Stud Medicinisti, Consiliul Nat al Elevilor, Asoc Stud Univ Arta si Design, Grupa de initiativa Basarabeana, Asoc Stud Contabili RATIO, Cons Stud FSPAC, ELSA, Societății Stud Europenisti Cluj, Consiliul Județean al Elevilor din Cluj, but they do not have any youth protocol.

Institutions

Regarding the institutions, 7 out of 8 have collaborations with different entities. On average each institution is collaborating with around 5 organisations, such as OSUT, FTC, OSUBB, COS, ASPR, AIESEC, OSM. Out of 8 institutions, 2 of them do not have youth protocol, while 7 do have.

Informal groups

There are only two informal groups which filled in the survey, one of the does not have any youth network and the other one in involved in OSM (Medical Students’ Organization from ClujNapoca), SCOPH (The Standing Committee on Public Health), FASMR (Federația Asociațiilor Studenților în Medicină din România).

One of the informal groups (Define School) has as partners Innovation Labs, SAS UTCN, UTCN, Salt&Pepper, FTC, Techsylvania, while the other one (Micii Sanitari) has as partners Com-On,
5 schools and high schools, Complexul de Servicii Sociale Cluj-Napoca, Organizatia Studentilor
Medicinisti, Science On Going and Centrul de Implantologie Transilvania.

Qualitative data analysis (focus groups)

In order to have an insight into how youth organisations in Cluj-Napoca work, we used a qualitative research method – the group interview. In total, between February and March 2023 we have conducted seven focus groups, which can be classified according to the type of organisation to which the participants belong, as follows:

1. public institutions;
2. NGOs from universities;
3. NGOs from faculties;
4. political parties and religious groups;
5. LQBTQA+ community and informal groups;
6. NGOs of ethnic minorities;
7. youth workers (which did not represent a specific organisation).

Twenty-seven young people participated in the discussions, which were moderated by youth workers, volunteers within the Youth Federation of Cluj. Most of them were conducted by two facilitators – a main interviewer and an assistant.

Findings from focus groups with youth organisations

The interview guide consisted of three main sections. The first of them, which had an introductory role, asked questions about the presence of respondents and their tasks in organisations, as well as the purpose of the represented organisations and their projects. The second part of the discussion was structured around our desire to get to know organisations in depth. Through our questions we asked what resources they need, the difficulties they face, imagined ways of solving them, the partnerships and collaborations they have. The final section of the research tool proposed to participants to talk about how they imagine the future – both for themselves and for the organisations they belong to.

During the focus groups, moderators presented five participatory mapping exercises to the young people, which were meant to observe their perspectives when it comes to positioning the represented organisations on different types of maps, along with other organisations. The criteria we followed in making the maps were: the size of the organisation, the field of activity, the geographical area in which the organisation operates, collaborations with other organisations, perceived current and future impact of the organisations.

a. Description of the focus groups participants and the organisations they belong to

We tried that the people who were invited to discussions – from NGOs, informal groups or other types of structures – to have seniority at least 1-2 years in order to be informed about the activity of the organisations they belong to. Most representatives of non-governmental organisations that participated in the focus groups are in leadership positions, as presidents, vice-presidents or coordinators of specific areas of action. Larger university organisations have between 30 and 1100 active members, while faculty-level organisations describe their teams as consisting of up to 11 individuals. The rest of the organisations – political parties, informal and religious groups, the LGBTQA+ community or ethnic minority organisations – have variable components, as is their field of interest or the type of activity they carry out.

Referring to the tasks that respondents have, we mention that they vary, depending on the type of organisations in which they work. While for the representatives of student organisations, their responsibilities were specifically described, for those who do not have a clearly defined legal personality – such as political parties and religious organisations – the descriptions of their duties were more comprehensive. Thus, in some cases we found out that the latter are involved both in the overall well-being of the organisation (project coordination, external representation, maintaining collaborations) and in very specific activities such as copywriting, creating events, etc.

Organised or not, young people can bring about important changes in society, we just have to listen to them. Cluj Youth Event. Photo credit: Gabi Sandru

“[…] as president, in addition to a good relationship with everyone else, I have to be sure that everything goes according to plan and that all events are carried out.” (representative of a faculty organisation)

“I am pretty much everywhere, because I have to coordinate all the people […]. I am involved in everything related to events, coordination, and teaching young people.” (representative of a religious group)

“I mainly deal with press releases, copyright, image of organisation, graphic design and so much more. If there are other tasks, for example for the press releases, to talk to the press or to bring other people for the image responsibilities… I have other colleagues who help me, but I am the coordinator.” (representative of an youth political party)

b. The goals of the organisations and the projects in which they are involved

When asked what the purpose of the organisations they represent is, young people from university or faculty NGOs spoke primarily about the processes of representing students and their rights, at the faculty, university, local, but also national level. At the same time, some of the participants in the discussions talked about projects with complementary purposes to the student representation, such as: personal and professional development, expanding knowledge in the cultural domain, medical education, promoting sport and its benefits and preventing university dropouts.

By raising issues in the community we can find reliable solutions. Cluj Youth Event. Photo credit: Gabi Sandru

“The main goal is to represent students, but also their professional and cultural development […] through projects, in principle. And besides that, I would somehow add the prevention of university abandonment through campaigns. And not only that, but the pre-university abandonment, too.” (representative of a university organisation)

“I agree with what colleagues said, with the representation part. This is, also, our main goal. But we also try to help them on the employment and practice side of the work field.” (representative of a faculty organisation)

“We do numerous information campaigns on various diseases.” (representative of a faculty organisation)

“We have projects on medical education, there are more of those. One of the most interesting is the one where our volunteers teach basic life support, practically resuscitation and airway release, if someone drowns. We teach them free of charge, unlike other NGOs or companies and enterprises that require 500 RON per course. […] We also have a project through which we go to disadvantaged environments and tell the young people all sorts of information about diabetes, hypertension, and various common diseases. […] We have projects focused only on the sports side […], others that deal with hobbies, we have orchestra, choir, cenacle […].” (representative of a university organisation)

Deputy Mayor Dan Tarcea at the opening of the Cluj Youth Event, showing the support and openness of the municipality to the Cluj youth sector. Photo credit: Gabi Sandru

The participants from the political parties told us that they generally aim to bring young people closer to the political sector, making them understand it better, by internship programs with parliamentarians and county councillors, various debates, consultations with civil society (e.g. budget amendments or education laws), educational camps for students, afforestation campaigns, etc.

“We are clearly a political organisation. But since we are a political organisation and many of us are involved in the public administration at local, county or central level, we have all sorts of projects that touch other spectra, such as the educational one, sometimes even religious. And then of course […] the projects we are starting are not strictly political because we do not just, let’s say, political debates, we also make administrative debates and we reach all the splits.” (representative of an youth political party)

“We are very well suited to many types of projects – cultural, social, political and educational, even religious. […] We have an education caravan that is constantly helping students in the final years because we know very well the hardest exams are National Assessment and Baccalaureate. At the same time, […] on the environmental side, we have afforestation projects […].” (representative of an youth political party)

Religious groups aim to train young people in this field, but also aim at a multitude of other projects that support young people in different ways: providing a discussion space by organising conferences with debate sections, scholarships for students and campaigns to collect donations of necessary objects for the study.

“Although we come from the religious sphere, we do not limit ourselves to this alone. As a fundamental goal, we want to train young people in Christian ethics, to have good conduct and to be of benefit to this society. A project or action in the social area is a scholarship that we finance, which we offer to students from Cluj-Napoca. We organise charity campaigns, in which we collect different objects and then donate them to those who have different needs […].” (representative of a religious organisation)

Informal groups, depending on their specificity, have described us several very diverse areas in which they are involved to fulfil their goals: education for general medical knowledge, and specifically for mental health; cultural and sports activities and promotion of future artists; knowledge and support for the respect of women’s rights; development of children’s critical thinking; integration of the deaf-mute community into society. Representatives of groups that support the LGBTQA+ communities have specifically told us about one of their very important goals – to regularly organise testing sessions for sexually transmitted infections for queer men and transgender women, and to provide counselling for those with infections which are not usually tested.

“We are not a political organisation, but because we do a lot of activism, human rights work – for women and girls especially – we have a political impact. Most activities are correlated with the City Hall, the Government and other public institutions. […] We have all kinds of initiatives, such as changing the laws for girls and women, […] ee organise The Cluj Pride, an initiative at the local community level that presents and militates for the rights of LGBTQ people.” (representative of a LQBTQ organisation)

“We offer social services, free of charge, because we are oriented toward a category of young minority. But we also act in the educational sphere, because besides the actual testing, the people who come to us to get tested will go home with information about each sexually transmitted infection and so I think we educate them to have healthy sexual behaviour.” (representative of an informal youth group)

“We are also trying to develop children’s critical thinking. We have a philosophy club for them. […] Every month we propose certain themes of awareness and try to listen to them. We don’t want to educate them in a certain direction. We can come up with a counterargument, but my justice does not have to be the justice of the other. We have many social themes about the integration of minorities or about immigrants, animal rights […] We recently started a philosophy session with a text on bullying and sexual harassment. I think the topics have a great impact on them.” (representative of an informal youth group)

c. Resources needed to carry out the work. Difficulties encountered by organisations

Imagine the future of tomorrow and what you could do better for those around you, implicitly also for yourself.
Cluj Youth Event. Photo credit: Paula Ivașcu

For non-governmental organisations, informal or religious groups, young people from political parties, ethnic Hungarian communities or LQBTQ+ community, financial resources, human resources and infrastructure (office spaces, capabilities for various materials production, and their warehousing etc.) are the three most important types of needs they have in their work.

“We have money mostly from the community. […] For events we do a lot of unpaid work, but this is already very stressful. […] We also receive funds from other organisations, from embassy consulates, corporations that call and tell us they want to finance sometimes. We avoid AFCN as much as we can, because we went through a procedure with them and it was incredibly difficult to get help from them. It was a traumatic experience […] we felt that we have lost our dignity in the process. Sometimes we get international funds. These are our sources.” (representative of an informal youth group)

“Our funds are a complicated part for us […] We have tried to get them through online promotion, on Instagram and on Facebook. In the past few years, we rely on the contributions of volunteers. […] We tried last year to contact about 15 small clinics to see if they want to help us. […] We told them that we were trying to increase awareness, especially on this medical side, so that a diagnosis could be made for a deaf patient. However, they are quite reluctant to seek help, as they are not socially integrated. But if they would want to appeal, to be sure that they will be understood and they can express themselves.” (representative of an informal youth group) 

“We don’t have much money and resources. We write and apply for funding, but it’s hard to get the needed amounts. We have plans, but the conditions are difficult. We need a location, several spaces, with stationery materials, which cost a lot. […]” (representative of an informal youth group)

“We do not support ourselves internally because we do not ask for a membership fee, but there are donations. Usually those who support us are former members who work in various fields and donate to the association. We are supported by some universities in Cluj, the Metropolitanate of Cluj, and also by the other partner NGOs.” (representative of a religious group)

“I think that human and financial resources are the hardest to get. However, I believe that human resources can often compensate for the financial ones.” (representative of an youth political party)

Although it can certainly be improved, the situation of organisations in faculties and universities is a little more optimistic than that of other young people, as they often manage to obtain the necessary resources from the higher education institutions in which they operate.

“In our case, the university gives us space and everything we need. Other times we use the House of Culture and more recently we also do activities in the youth center.” (representative of a university organisation)

“When we have projects, we carry out our main activity in the University amphitheatres and we also have a headquarters, a dormitory room, which the university provides us with.” (representative of a university organisation)

“For some activities we need logistical help from sponsors, partners, and the University.” (representative of a university organisation)

“We lack prints. They are very expensive and we have no partnership.” (representative of a faculty organisation)

“In addition to the already mentioned materials, we add to the list the necessary materials for experiments.” (representative of a faculty organisation)

The pandemic period has been a difficult time for organisations and its consequences continue to be visible. Thus, after the moments when many of the activities either did not take place, or took place less often or online, young people talk about an overall attitude on the part of volunteers who do not want to be involved, fact which leads them to do more to attract and retain those who want to contribute in any way.

By getting involved in the community, you can add value and develop yourself. Cluj Youth Event. Photo credit: Paula Ivaşcu

“A difficulty for us is attracting children and young people, human resources, generally. Keeping young people in one place seems difficult, because you have to come with new and attractive things all the time. It’s hard, young people leave, move to other cities and that’s the most difficult. We have solved a lot of problems internally, we learn from mistakes. […] As part of international organisations, we turn to them sometimes when we have difficulties, to get through difficult situations more easily.” (representative of a religious youth group)

“We perceive a big difference between generations in terms of volunteering. After COVID19 volunteers are even more difficult to find.” (representative of a minority group)

“With all this period of pandemic in which we stayed at home, I think we got used to being only us with our head and anything that implies socialisation, collaboration and responsibility it feels a heavy task. If you ask people to take on certain responsibilities, they don’t do it much, and it’s very hard to motivate them and bring them back to this waterline. […] Well, the idea is that there are not many involved volunteers […]. For example, I can say this week that we have wasted more time solving internal problems on behalf of organising events. Either someone gives up or forgets, or so on.” (representative of an informal youth group)

“One problem we faced during the pandemic was, surprisingly, the number of volunteers. […] It was a big problem, but the good thing is that we managed to revive. We have put a lot of effort into promoting our organisation and our activities and now we have a lot of volunteers.” (representative of a university organisation)

Andreea Alexandra Scrioșteanu, vice-president of the European Youth Forum presented at the Cluj Youth Event discussing the implementation of the Youth Test. Photo credit: Gabi Sandru

At the same time, there are other frequently mentioned difficulties – the collaboration with authorities (which are not always open to supporting young people), but also with other private actors who could contribute through funding for young people’s projects.

“Sometimes we have problems with sponsors. They think we take from the money they give us. But that is not the case at all. Many times, I gave money for our activities.” (representative of an informal group).

“We needed help from the City Hall of Cluj. For example, we need a space, the City Hall has this space, but they don’t want to give it to us. […] In Iasi we have in the city center a location of our own where we can test for a rent of only 100 RON per month. We also submitted this request to Cluj and they gave us a very remote location. We don’t necessarily have to be in the center of the city, but we want to be accessible. I suggested to them three places we know they have and are not used in any way and they said they are given to other organisations, even if they are empty. […] Cluj, at the declarative level, is extremely open, but it seems to me that related to the LGBTQ community, it is not. We want more support from the municipality. Not necessarily financially, if it is not possible.” (representative of a LGBTQ organisation)

“One problem is the type of organisation. Sometimes it is more difficult to find collaborations, because not everyone wants to affiliate with one party or another. […] But most of the time we find solutions, even with the private entities.” (representative of a youth political party)

“In addition to the lack of interest of students, we also have difficulties collaborating with CCS. Somehow, only through the FTC we were able to reach CCS every time, and not through the organisation. This is very sad, because it is the student Culture House.” (representative of a university organisation)

In general, young people aim to solve the difficulties they face internally, through discussions and debates. This way they often become creative in their approaches, constantly adapting either the way they present themselves or the projects they carry out.

“To bring in new people, we’ve changed the social media interface, our flyers, to be catchier.” (representative of a faculty organisation)

“We have managed to become a partner for the financial needs we have.” (representative of a faculty organisation)

“We try to get to different places through the people we know, to get more support.” (representative of a faculty organisation)

Beyond collaborations and partnerships for specific projects (which are a continuous concern of youth organisations), and internal changes (which are not always enough to solve difficulties), a viable solution is to seek support for the umbrella organisations to which young people belong. They manage to provide in some cases an important part of the necessary funding, visibility, but also logistical support. In this context, the Youth Federation of Cluj has been mentioned several times, as a reliable partner in solving the challenges arising during the development of some projects. The funding provided by Com’ON has also been described as being very helpful for organisations’ work plans.

“We are part of another larger student organisation that groups us, […] And there, with a lot of national and regional activities and projects, we met and made friends. We noticed that several organisations are facing this lack of people and we decided to do activities together, to change the landscape a little more and to get to know each other.” (representative of a university organisation)

The formal opening of the General Assembly of the Cluj Youth Federation, welcome speech from the host Flavius Milășan – director of the Student Culture House “Dumitru Fărcaș” from Cluj-Napoca, at the Cluj Youth Event. Photo credit: Gabi Sandru

“We have (and we are members in) various international and world structures. We see them as partners. We submit local projects to the City Hll and Council, but we also have international projects.” (representative of a religious group)

“We don’t have long-term partners, but more short-term ones. In general, we do and we solve problems internally. Or we ask other NGOs for various training. As federations, we are part of the FTC, ANOSR, COS and the national association which is representing us.” (representative of a faculty organisation)

“The money from Com’ON Cluj helped us. For example, we had no money in September and we were able to go to foster care centers and give gifts to children.” (representative of an informal group)

“I can also add that the Com’ON sponsorship has helped us greatly to increase our promotion. I have to say that we are also working with the national association of which we are members and we have great support from them.” (representative of an informal group)

d. The future of organisations and their development plans

About the skills of young people, how to discover them and put them to good use at the Cluj Youth Event. Photo credit: Paula Ivașcu

When it comes to the plans of their organisations, young people have enthusiastically described some of them. First, they want to overcome the limitations they have had in their work because of the pandemic context. Then, they want to have more impact – both among the communities they represent and at a larger level – local or national. Although they think they are in the right direction of growth, they want to attract more volunteers and active members, to diversify their projects and target groups, to be more digitised, but also to be more visible in the virtual environment, specifically on social media networks.

“We want a return after the pandemic period in which the level of involvement has significantly reduced and we try to involve volunteers as actively as possible in projects and leadership positions. At the same time, we focus on the student representation side. In terms of the trajectory in the future, we want more visibility for the organisation, and we will target students who are not yet part of an organisation. We need more digitalization, the development of new projects and the maintenance of those that are in progress.” (representative of a university organisation)

“The pandemic was very difficult for us, because we had to bring everything back to normal. But I think we are on the right track and I believe that the future Board of Directors and the future people in the organisation will do it.” (representative of a faculty organisation)

“The organisation will certainly maintain its mission. There are people in charge who see the NGO and its mission very clearly. The activities we propose will be equally qualitative. Of course, we want to diversify our activity and increase the number of participants, but I believe and hope that we can grow every year.” (representative of an ethnic minority organisation)

“Our ideal goal is to get as much as possible to integrate the deaf community in Romanian society. In the future we want to start adding to the courses we do some workshops for medical students […] at least from Cluj. Then we somehow want to spread to the whole country a few branches of ours.” (representative of an informal group)

e. Actors who can support the work of young people in the future

In the future, the main goals of the organisations will remain largely the same, but young people are confident that the different and innovative visions of those who will form the work teams will make significant contributions to the current plan of growth of the organisations. To fulfil their plans, young people talk again about the need to have the support of Youth Federation of Cluj (FTC), students’ federations, but also of other NGOs outside the youth ones, universities, the City Hall and the County Council.

The opening of the second edition of MeetUp OurCluj within the Cluj Youth Event. Photo credit: Roland Vaczi

“I think that, in principle, the federations of which we are part (ANOSR, FTC) could be very helpful for us.” (representative of an university organisation)

“What I am thinking about now as being helpful would be consultations between various actors in the local sphere: students, young people, institutions and so on. I think that broadly this would be about. Because usually the debates bring ideas and ideas further to projects.” (representative of a youth political party)

“I would like to see more NGOs involved on the political side of society. I think this story with x and y and z consultations sounds good, but the practical part, there we have a problem.” (representative of a youth political party)

“For now we see to be useful a collaboration with the City Hall or the County Council. This part of collaboration I think would be the most relevant and important.” (representative of a youth religious group)

f. The future in Cluj-Napoca

Making plans is beneficial to have a compass on your journey. Cluj Youth Event. Photo credit: Gabi Sandru

Although most of the young people said that Cluj-Napoca is a place that has many opportunities, friendly with fulfilling the organisations’ plans, there were also some of them who drew attention to the need to improve the context offered by the city for youth activities. Here references were made especially to the difficulty of finding suitable workspaces, but also to the growing problem in the real estate field of the very high prices for housing. In terms of urban infrastructure, there are also limitations, as many of the public spaces are not friendly to people with physical disabilities.

“I really don’t see any better city. First of all because of the private environment, which has a great potential to finance NGOs. And it seems that they really want to do that after all. The opening that we have from the city hall, and federations I think is important, too.” (representative of a university organisation)

“For us it is clear. We have here many institutions that help us: the theatre, opera, philharmonic.” (representative of a faculty organisation)

“For us it is ideal, the IT field is constantly developing, a fact which is perfect for us and our students.” (representative of a faculty organisation)

“We want to work in Cluj, […] but we would like to expand to some localities in the county with which we are not currently working. We would like to go to Bontida, Aiton, etc.” (representative of an ethnic minority organisation)

“There are branches of our university in Targu Mures, Miercurea Ciuc and St. George and we want to collaborate with them.” (representative of an ethnic minority organisation)

“We want to collaborate with CJE from Cluj County, wherever they are, for example in Dej, Gherla, Turda and Huedin.” (representative of an ethnic minority organisation)

“One problem of the city is that there are not too many areas for people with disabilities and we have quite a lot of students with such problems.” (representative of a faculty organisation)

“We would like an extension outside the Cluj-Napoca. Here you can afford a rent and you have opportunities now, given the possibility to work online. But we would also like a physical presence outside the county, in other cities. We would like to go to Oradea, Baia Mare, Târgu Mureș, Craiova and so on.” (representative of an informal group)

“From my point of view, Cluj-Napoca is a good area for young people who want to create a future for themselves. We are very happy where we are, everything is good for us, but the city has a problem. Cluj Napoca has developed a lot in real estate and IT domains and has become problematic for the youth who get here and who aren’t either medicinists, mathematics-informatics students, or who manage in some business. Somehow, they go to a very low level of the middle class.” (representative of a youth political party)

g. The imagined future of young people

Those who are currently involved in organisations told us in the last section of the interviews about their wishes to continue the work dedicated to young people. Whether they will have a mandate for the same position in the organisation, or other roles within it, or support it from outside, they are convinced that they will contribute in multiple ways to the good of the wider community of young people. Meanwhile, they are trying to convey what they have learned to those around them, hoping that these things will spread to as many volunteers as possible who want to get involved in actions to support young people.

“Personally, I want to have another term of office as president, because I believe that this title requires continuity.” (representative of a university organisation)

“I think this is my last year in which I will be president. I think I’ve done enough from that position. Later I will be very close to the organisation and the new CD, because it is important to have people you can rely on.” (representative of a faculty organisation)

“My mandate is coming to an end and now I was thinking about whether to run again, but probably not, although it would be possible according to the state of the organisation. There are other things in life, priorities. My goal is to be a collaborator for the association.” (representative of a religious organisation)

“I will not be involved in leadership anymore, but I will remain in the organisation from the shadows. I would not necessarily continue as a coordinator because I want to focus a bit more on the academic side. […] But I want to stay in the project and I would choose more to be on this side of external relations. […] I think that what I bring to the team is a very focused perspective on mental health and social inclusion, and I think it’s an important one.” (representative of an informal group)

“I still have five years of my current term, so I will probably run in the future, I will get involved in what I can. I feel that I can contribute to the organisation and I believe that I can make an external contribution to it in the long run, too.” (representative of a youth political party)

h. The perception of Cluj Youth Mapping project

Perspectives in which Cluj Youth Mapping can become a benchmark for such initiatives at the international level and how Francesca Cristea contributes to this. Cluj Youth Event. Photo credit: Paula Ivașcu

The idea of the Cluj Youth Mapping project was very well received by the young people who were interviewed in the data collection phase. As a summary of their opinions on this topic, we mention that from their point of view the resulting maps could be helpful for improving communication between NGOs for collaboration purposes, for increasing visibility in the community and implicitly for the development of the organisations themselves. By knowing the organisations working in Cluj County through the maps, they will be able to see the possible problems of the community. In cases where they would identify common problems, they could join efforts to resolve them. Also, the young Hungarians told us that given the importance that the project results can have in the development of the organisations, they consider that it is necessary to organise sessions for their presentation and dissemination also in Hungarian. 

“Building a network of young people – visible to a wide audience – would have a very important contribution, because it would encompass their common interests and would help implement new projects and ideas.” (representative of a university organisation)

“It will help improve communication between NGOs and their collaboration for joint projects. The project will help to increase visibility in the community and implicitly, the growth of the organisation itself. The map will be used to see which NGOs are in Cluj county and what they do. They will also see the potential problems of the community and if they are common, they can unite as youth organisations and solve the problems of the community they are in.” (representative of a faculty organisation)

“It will expand the horizon of young people, especially since many organisations from Cluj have the same target group.” (representative of a religious organisation)

“This way we will be more present for the general public, more easily known and will have the opportunity to get to know other associations.” (representative of a religious organisation)

Findings from the focus group with the representatives of public institutions

Focus group with institutions that have attributions in the field of youth, in the foreground Dora Mănăstire representative of the French Institute in Romania in Cluj-Napoca, at the Cluj-Napoca Youth Center. Photo credit: Gabi Sandru

This subchapter is a distinct component of the qualitative data analysis result, as we wanted to capture the opinions of those working in public institutions from Cluj-Napoca and collaborating with young people in organisations. Broadly speaking, the topics we discussed with this category of interviewees were the same as those from the other focus groups – an initial description of the participants and their professional routes, followed by the presentation of the specific activity they carry out in the public institution. The central focus was also on the detail of the entity that those present at the group meeting represent. Thus, we talked about the goals that institutions have, the difficulties they face and the adequate ways to solve them, the resources most frequently needed in their work, collaborations they mobilise, but also the imagined plans for the represented institution.

We talked to five people working in local public institutions that implement activities or projects in cooperation with young people from Cluj-Napoca. Each of them has specific ways in which they contribute to the well-being of young people. For us it was a pleasure to notice the enthusiasm they had for discussing in detail what their work with young people is about.

Public institutions generally have the role of supporting and working with young people to provide them with the resources they need. In this regard, among the projects we found out about during the focus groups are: providing the necessary infrastructure for youth activities; allocating budgets for vocational counselling of pupils or improving communication with young people; facilitating meetings for youth: consultative council, summits or forums for youth initiatives, as well as the development of a web platform dedicated to young people; supporting and encouraging those with cultural and artistic interests by organising large-scale events; preventing drug use; encouraging the discovery the specificities of other cultures.

“We found that last year […] that there is a real need for vocational counselling, especially for pupils, which is why I requested a budget for vocational counselling and career guidance courses. We are considering somewhere 400 young people. […] Vocational counselling must be done by schools. Unfortunately, schools do not have qualified staff and these tasks are done on a voluntary basis. We try to see to what extent this vocational counselling can become a public policy. It is important because the analyzes in recent years have revealed that a main cause of abandonment in the university, which is quite high, according to statistics […] is between 30 and 40%. So, one of the causes is that young people made a wrong decision when they enrolled in college x, and the decision is wrong because it is not consistent with their capabilities.” (Cluj-Napoca Youth Center)

“Our institution must be viewed from two perspectives. First, we are in this area of covering the infrastructure needs of student and youth organisations, which until now did not have a youth center. […] We cover everything that means expenses in the area of the youth organisation, which means the use of the infrastructure, (for example: a video projector, musical instruments, a rehearsal room, mini-buses) they create wear and create expenses. We also add utilities, all of which are managed in terms of a plan that we prepare annually. And believe me, spending is in the hundreds of millions exceeding a few billion a year. But we also support young people from a cultural and artistic point of view. It’s a very intense job.” (Students’ Cultural House)

“Next year we aim to run an anti-bullying campaign, because in addition to the consumption of banned substances, the issue of bullying and what you already said about the mental health of young people are also important problems.” (Cluj County Council)

There is a visible difference between public institutions and all other organisations that participated in the group discussions – while for the institutions, financial resources are not perceived as a difficulty in carrying out their projects, for youth organisations, obtaining financial resources is a constant challenge. On the other hand, however, the representatives of the institutions talk about the lack of human resources or the people with whom to carry out the projects they plan. One solution that some of them use to implement is collaboration processes, so they can cover the need for volunteers.

“Where I felt a problem is in the human resource area, specifically in the volunteer area. But I think that together with the student associations, we can solve it. We collaborate with both the institutional environment and with the NGO environment but also with private companies. […] Other than that, we have had no financial or other resource problems so far.” (Cluj County Department for Sport and Youth)

“If 30 years ago the institution operated with over 50 people, we now have around 28 people, and our need would be for at least 35 people so that we can function more efficiently. From a cultural point of view, the budget covers us somewhere at 30-40% of what we want to achieve in the cultural departments. As for difficulties, I think it would be this lack of funding, but at the same time the general issue of staff salaries in cultural institutions. We collaborate now with the Federation Youth, Culture Associations, the youth direction of the university, each project was done with a partner. That’s how we focused on covering our need for volunteers. That was a problem. I feel that it is more difficult for us as a public institution to attract volunteers. […] On the side of difficulties, what we are facing now in our activity is the dilemma of how we can reach young people through our projects.” (Students’ Cultural House)

“We are a small team, as I said, and I think this is the biggest difficulty in our projects. The fact that we would like to do even more and better to reach more people but because of human resources we do not succeed all the time. We rely heavily on students because they are really the ones who have the obligation to do a professional practice through the university contract, which I say motivates them more unless they were simple volunteers. They must perform a certain number of hours per semester and then they are constantly involved in our activity.” (French Institute of Cluj-Napoca)

Also, in terms of dialogue and collaboration with young people, the representatives of the institutions acknowledge that there are some limitations they have:

“I don’t think I’m just speaking on my behalf if I say that all institutions have poor communication with young people for several reasons. One is the stereotype about administration in general. The second reason is that sometimes the administration does not communicate with young people, and their dialog fails often because of this. […] Young people need to know from us what’s going on in the youth area for which I want to make a news team in the youth area to send weekly land to report the week with what is relevant in the area.” (Cluj-Napoca Youth Center)

Beyond the difficulties they face in current activities, each of the representatives of public institutions told us about plans. From their perspective, the desire to expand geographically is toward the intensification of youth participation, especially for those outside the metropolitan area of Cluj – from Gherla, Dej, Huedin, respectively Florești, Baciu, Chinteni și Apahida.

“We have institutions all over the country and each of them have some areas or counties of influence. For Cluj-Napoca, we are loading to reach eight other cities near Cluj. We do not succeed with all our projects and events, but we try to reach them in time.” (French Institute of Cluj-Napoca)

“I would like to have an activity focused more on young people outside the area of ClujNapoca, because there are already many entities operating in the youth area. In municipalities such as Gherla, Câmpia Turzii and Turda, as far as I know, there are youth organisations that focus very much on this area. There are other entities (also very active) located on the first ring of the metropolitan area and here I am referring to Floresti, Baciu, Chinteni, Apahida, where in recent years many young people have chosen to live or work.” (Cluj County Council)

In focus groups telling about teams of organisations, institutions and informal groups. Photo credit: Gabi Sandru

Being asked about how they perceive the usefulness of the process of building a Cluj youth map, the participants at focus group told us about the multiple benefits they identify in using such an instrument: identifying organisations that are not so visible, finding out their needs, meeting new potential collaborators and building together with them innovative and useful ideas for young communities.

“It would be very useful for us to think of certain projects in a certain area where we do not have contacts. That’s why we did a bit of research. My colleague and I went by our institution car through localities to talk in schools to see their situation. We spoke about the state of youth from their community because we didn’t have anyone to contact.” (Students’ Cultural House)

“We have a budget that is allocated to different domains and it is important to know where there is an active youth population. We have to take the pulse from them to see what they need and how to intervene in order to prevent the exodus of young people living in urban areas. It (the map) would be a very good mechanism, which would certainly help all public institutions and all actors in the field. It is a practical census, for this it would be ideal to have as many public institutions as possible and young people who currently study in rural areas.” (Cluj County Council)

“We are very proud to be on this map. I think we have partners with whom we can do things together. I believe that in the future, the key to success for institutions and all other actors involved in youth activities would be to work together. We may already do it at the micro level, but sometimes we can make events together bigger and better and easier.” (French Institute of Cluj-Napoca)

Findings from focus group with youth workers

Seven youth workers participated in this group discussion – four girls and three boys. Five of them got their official qualification at the end of last year (November 2022), and the other two earlier, during the pandemic, when the course was conducted online.

Vlada Siviroveanu – youth worker from the Cluj Youth Federation network facilitating focus group within Cluj Youth Mapping. Photo credit: Gabi Sandru

The reasons why our respondents decided to take the qualification courses are diverse. Some of them were curious and wanted to learn more about this field, others had examples around them that led them to follow this path, and others were already working with young people and thought this was the natural next step to be taken to develop themselves.

“I really like this area of personal development and volunteering activities in different organisations. I have had the love of working with young people for a very long time. In high school when I first did the youth worker course, it was one at the national level […], nobody told me that I can’t take the accreditation because I don’t have a high school diploma yet, but it was an experience. Now, for me it was very important to be able to connect with the organisational environment in Cluj. To find people and young people who do things here so I can get involved. I took the course once more and then took the accreditation.” (R, 24 years old)

“People say that work with young people is the hardest, at least the one with teenagers. But I wanted to see why they thought this way. And in fact, I knew that this saying is not true. I really wanted to see how I should approach them and how to add value to the youth community and I knew that through the course, I will know how to approach young people and what activities to do with them to help them grow.” (S, 23 years old)

Most of them followed the course conducted by the Ministry of Youth and Sports, but the young people interviewed also mentioned the Youth Association from Cluj and the Federation of Youth Federation of Cluj among the organisations that offer this possibility of education and learning.

The youth workers we spoke to were generally satisfied with attending the course, but they also mentioned that they would have liked the members who took the course to be involved in a more intense manner in practical activities after the accreditation process. Although none of those interviewed have been employed as youth workers so far, most of them can give concrete examples where the skills associated with this role have been useful to the work they have done in the past or even now.

“I would have liked there to be continuity […] after obtaining the accreditation, to be activated faster. It seems to me that a lot of people who took their accreditation in the last round, were lost. They are no longer motivated.” (R, 24 years old)

“I would have liked a more practical approach. At its end – more practice and more contexts and opportunities in this direction would have been nice to have. […] Nothing happened after that moment. Somehow, I let go of the longing, I didn’t focus on that, on the part of the qualified youth worker. But it would have been interesting for us to meet there, that there was a lot of energy to do things and organise some things then.” (A, 21 years old)

The projects in which youth workers have been involved in this capacity are most frequently from areas such as: cultural, education, social, health and sport. In the category of specific problems that young people have encountered in their work, it was mentioned the lack of involvement of those who enrol in youth programs.

“I saw a communication problem, in the idea in which we tried to organise an online project. Young people responded very late, and I noticed that especially those in high school make a commitment, register, fill in the form and that’s it. The next steps are left in the air, they no longer respond, and they are no longer interested. Or if they are, it’s 10 minutes and ready, here I see a very big problem and I think how it could be solved.” (A, 21 years old)

“It seems to me that we do not speak their language. That is. Generations have changed so much that we no longer know how to approach them.” (V, 23 years old)

More generally, youth workers believe that this qualification is not well known even to those working in the field, which often makes youth organisations or organisations that do activities for youth not to ask for their expertise. Young people feel the need to be part of a community where they can share, but also get ideas about what it is like to be a youth worker. Constantly and in various ways activated (through formal meetings, but also socialising or leisure), this community would contribute in an important way to strengthening the qualifications that they have already acquired.

“The fact that people don’t know what a youth worker is, that’s what I see as a problem.”(V. C., 26 years old)

“I think it’s because there aren’t many positions available or for us. In schools there should be a youth worker. […] I don’t think the people know us. There is not a database with youth workers in Cluj to call them if you have any problems.” (A, 21 years old)

“A youth worker could add value in schools, for example. They could come and talk to children and students, to do activities with them. […] That would be great, to have a database and to let the world know where they are, and you can contact them for information or help.” (R, 24 years old)

When asked about how they think the status of the youth worker will change in the future, the interviewees told us that they believe that things could only change through a legislative initiative to formalise their work.

“It will probably exist, I see a direction from the EU, to implement it. And then, if it is not implemented, fines are applied. I don’t see otherwise to be implemented in schools. Everything is political. In Cluj I don’t know how it works, but I don’t think it’s so different given the rest of the country. I don’t think that in 5 years much will change, I don’t trust Romania. […] I mean, you can work informally with young people and be a youth worker, but you’re going to have to be employed and you want money, and you can’t live only with smiles. […] Sure, you also may be a licensed individual and ask for the bill for every service, but it seems silly to me that we do not have other choices.” (V, 23 years old) 

“I haven’t seen youth workers employed in five years; I don’t think so. It seems to me that what can be changed would also be this third sector, with the side of the NGOs. It will not change if there is no community between youth workers. We can’t reach young people now and the thing is that if you want to do something serious, you must have a community.” (R., 24 years old)

As personal plans, young people want to remain connected with the NGO environment, and work with young people. For that, they believe that Cluj-Napoca is a suitable city to carry out this activity, given its image as a city of students and young people.

“I plan to open an educational center and I hope to succeed in September. It will have continuity for at least ten years, because that’s the contract. We will do extra activities with children and young people in rural areas. I think this will give me a new energy, that’s my dream and I’m glad it’s coming true. It will be on all levels: social, educational, that’s about it, that’s the plan. […] If you are looking for them, in Cluj are many activities in which you can get involved. People are searching for young people and students to get involved in all kinds of projects. It is an attractive city for young people, not only through events, but through any other attraction. Okay, less the rent, but well…” (A, 21 years old)

“I don’t have such specific projects, although somehow it was clear to me after high school that I will not work in a corporation, but I will stay in the NGO environment. People still ask me what I want to do. Now I will stay in this environment, I don’t know. I will remain in the semi-formal environment I would like. As far as I know, I will go through several projects, where it is needed and what appears. We, students, are the ones who (we are a handful of us) want to do something. Especially if we come from NGOs, we still have the energy to take things further and get involved.” (R., 24 years old)

In the end, the youth workers told us that the maps resulting from the Cluj Youth Mapping project could help in several ways: to create connections between people and their organisations, to help those interested to easily find information about them and to function as a virtual platform where young people can find opportunities to get involved in the projects that suit them.

“I think it will help on the connection side, between youth workers and young people. I think for the NGOs, too. I don’t know if they’re thinking of making connections with other people. I believe that NGOs think they are dealing with their projects and that’s it. But it isn’t. I think the map will help a lot on the connection side.” (A, 21 years old)

“I think the goal is about that – to have a map of people / actors / NGOs / institutions that connect and do things together. To be super easy for young people. If everyone in the NGOs gave a share of this information related to the map and research, I think something beautiful would come out and there would be an even greater collaboration between them, and they would solve some community-level problems together.” (R., 24 years old)

“It would be nice a platform like in Erasmus, where people write for example: “look, we do this project, that’s what it’s about, in these areas, who’s interested?” It would be easy and handier. Much info appears after it happened, and we see that it was. That stage of planning and involvement is missing. […] To be informed before, to be able to prepare the people and to get involved with the right and necessary resources.” (C, 22 years old)

Qualitative data analysis – case studies interviews

We planned this component of our study as a series of case studies, because we wanted to interact more profoundly with young people who are part of the structures for which we want to offer more visibility. We have conducted three in-depth interviews with the representative of the Cluj County High School Council [Consiliul Județean al Elevilor Cluj – CJE], Checkpoint ARAS and Students’ Culture House from Cluj-Napoca [Casa de Cultură a Studenților din Cluj]. Their results will be detailed in the next sections of this report. We tried to reproduce as many interview excerpts as possible, because we considered that they are very valuable in order to better understand the context in which the activity of the three organisations takes place.

Cluj County High School Council [Consiliul Județean al Elevilor Cluj - CJE

Team composition

The Management Office currently consists of eight people: president, vice president, a secretary
and the rest of the team are specialized directors. The Council represents 60 high schools in Cluj
County, of which 50 are active. There are usually about 45 members present at meetings.

The purpose of the structure

An important aspect to mention is that the Council is not an organization, but a structure. In
terms of its purpose, it focuses on various areas, such as: culture, volunteering, and school
curricula.

“At the moment, through the form on our website, Instagram, or private approaches, we respond to any message and curiosity, and we try to solve the situations. There are even cases of school abuse. We had a few cases of domestic abuse, even after the general meetings there are people who come to us and who believe we can help them in any way. We try to offer this idea, because after all, we represent them for a reason and we like to do that, that is, we get involved as we can.”

Establishment of the Council

“The Council in Cluj was founded in 2002, it was the first council organised and led only by students. Before that, the entities were led by inspectorates or ministries, and we were the first independent one. Last year we celebrated the 20-year council gala. The actual activity started in Dâmbovița, following a conversation between the ministry and pupils eager to do all this work. And that’s how the entity was born. In Cluj, we were, likewise, some students who through the Histrioniada of the high school students (the theatre festival that we still organise), managed to bring to life the council here, led only by students.”

Soul project

“Given that the Histrioniada of the high school students was our launch as a council, I could say that this is for us a soul project. But we have events that mean just as much to us – the Cluj High Student Days; the training session of the representative students and the campaign “rights are not optional”; through which we managed to raise awareness of the rights that youth have.”

Histrioniada of the high school students

“I came to experience this festival last year, directly in the coordination team. When I realised the amplitude of the project, I was already there, in the Student Culture House. And when I saw the number of students and the number of participants eager to be there, the volunteers and how excited everyone was, it was already like a dream.”

The scope. Through this project we try to popularise theatre, art and culture. We have around 10-15 participating teams for the show part of the event, but we also have one man shows.

The team. We also have volunteers, around 60-70, depending on the event. Last year, as the 20th edition was, it was a bit bigger. But it differs every time, it’s always different, even though it’s the same project, it’s always a different show.

Duration. It lasts 5 days, there are 2-3 days of show, depending on the event and how many bands there are, but we also have training days for participants with theatre and stage movement workshops.

Promotion / popularisation. As it reached its 20th edition, it gained popularity so, usually through social media, the information was disseminated and from there the high school students registered. We have the registration form everywhere, we have posters in the city and on the one-man show part, who feels and has courage, is welcome. It is always a selection and is made by a jury specialised in theatre and art.

Resources frequently required in the work of the Council

“I would start with an office space, because considering that we are all minors, it is quite difficult for us. We see each other after school at coffee shops and it’s pretty hard to find an adequate place.”

“We have a lot of ideas and projects or things we would like to do. And not only us, but also the young people we represent and those from other school boards. We all need resources: materials but at the same time financial because here is harder for us, as an entity. There are companies we approached, and we have not been able to obtain financing from them, but the problem also extends to European funds, the city hall or others. They all have these criteria, and we cannot meet them.”

Encountered difficulties

“A constant difficulty is obtaining financial resources; we don’t have much choice for it. So far, we have exceeded them with FTC support. If we receive any sponsorship or have a partnership, being minors, we have no chance to solve it by receiving the money – neither through donations nor otherwise. We have the alumni of the council who have finished their term and stayed close to us, but we remain on the issue that along the way they would change, and it is quite questionable, I would say.”

“Another problem we have is that not all of those who need our support reach us. We promote our projects in rural areas and in other parts of Cluj, among high school students, through other councils. But we can’t reach everyone, and I don’t think the total number is as big as it should and would be fine. I feel that we also lack the most important people who can help us spread our work.”

Partners and collaborators

“We have partnerships with many entities. On the side of opportunities, they are all based on the idea of education and training. Computer science is also part of the education category, because these are the most advanced projects in Cluj, at the moment. Others rely on entrepreneurship. But I could say that we also have private companies that do not necessarily have an interest in promoting their company or projects but attract students indirectly.”

“We also collaborate with other County Councils. We have the general meetings of the National Council for a very important report – on the implementation of the student’s status at national level. In addition to this, there are the general meetings where laws of education are debated or what are the problems we encounter as students and county council. And there is another joint event about once a year, being organised strictly for the management office, a regional training session, where several councils meet, where we learn to cooperate with each other.”

Plans for the future

“We have soul projects, which are annually happening. Everything will continue, but of course, it will develop, and each of them will develop in a good direction. We have a new project since the beginning of my term, in 2021, “Debate the system”. We promote the debate and how we can solve the problems that young people have encountered.”

Cluj Youth Mapping perceived utility

“I think that in the council it would help to find out about other school boards, looking for collaborators and projects. And on the community side, it would help us to discover people, new groups, and other collaborations.”

Students’ Culture House from Cluj-Napoca [Casa de Cultură a Studenților din Cluj - CSS].

Team composition

“We are the most frequented cultural institution in Transylvania, the most frequented institution by youth and students, and also in the area of Transylvania and at the same time we have the largest number of volunteer students involved in the activity of our cultural, artistic and youth departments. We have somewhere at 400 and some registered students. We have 6 departments of artistic culture: folklore, jazz, theatre, painting, graphic photography, contemporary modern dance, ballet, we have literature and a sports department of cheerleaders respectively.”

The scope of institution

“These Culture Houses are the only institutions in the country that take over talented young people and offer them the opportunity and the framework to take a step towards artistic professionalism. But at the same time, we are the area where many formal and non-formal education projects take place, where young people can develop in multiple ways. After all, our role is to create the framework in which the youth can develop.”

“Beyond our aim of creating, of being an institution of culture and education, we also use to save. And we saved (and it is not too much to say this) at least 2 projects in the last two years, for young people who did not have spaces to practise. Last year we had over 32 thousand direct and indirect beneficiaries (young people and students). There are days when there are 2 or 3 events, even 5 events a day, which means at least 1000 people per day in our institution.”

Establishment of CSS

“The idea of building a student culture house appeared in 1959, as the initiative of the first director, Laurentiu Odorog. He was also the one who initiated this institution from a legal point of view, respectively later he started the steps next to UBB and the management at that time to build a student culture house. The construction of the institution lasted a year and was inaugurated in August 1960. It was achieved with the massive contribution of students and young people from Cluj during that period.”

Carried out projects

“The institution coordinates the student camps, which take place every year, together with The Family, Youth and Equal Opportunities Ministry. From the budget we receive as a grant, at least 2, 3 or 4 are projects that we directly finance, either in the FTC area, COS or other NGOs and youth organisations that carry out their activity in the CCS area. Each department has a national or international festival, involving universities in the country, students, circles, departments.”

Frequently needed resources in activity

“Basically, the ministry is the main source of financing, but what should be mentioned is that our institution is supported almost entirely, apart from this subsidy that we receive for cultural activities. We have the ability to create, but we may not yet have the same support or understanding. For example, if we could create 100%, the equivalent of 40 very large activities per year, the support is in the area of 10-15 activities, and the difference is huge, I say. We also are undersized administratively and financially.”

Partners and collaborators

“Because we also have an educational side, we developed a much closer relationship with student and youth organisations five years ago, the Consortium of Student Organizations (COS), respectively with the Youth Federation in Cluj, both having headquarters in the student culture house. If before, this headquarters was temporary, for a determined period, later we decided to go for a period of 5 years, and now we are in a much more than professional relationship, but of friendship. We decided to go for an indefinite period, because it is normal for students to have that place of their own. It is called the Student Culture House, there are two defining terms: culture and students. We have, also, a collaboration with the universities, we try to take the discussion in that area, and we even support each other.”

“I would be happy to have more support in this area of activities from the city hall because the building belongs to them since 2010. We need this administrative evolution that we were talking about but at the same time it is necessary in the cultural artistic area for greater financing.”

Encountered difficulties

“The big challenge was the pandemic, we tried to keep young people in departments and involved. My desire is to open, beyond the national and international area for
different collaborations. We had discussions in Colombia, in Mexico, in the international area and exchanges between young people in the cultural and artistic area but also in the area of formal or non-formal education.”

“Another challenge is this cohesion and our interest in keeping and attracting young people and students to this department, because in this amalgam and in this run the world continues to get tired and it is normal. There is less and less interest in NGOs and youth organisations and less and less involvement. Why? Because it’s all this time and
all this running that ultimately creates other priorities for you and when you no longer have activity or disappear from the organisations or including in institutions, there is no one to do these projects or activities.”

Plans for the future

“I want to keep exchanges with young people, with leaders from the NGO area, to take young people with me to see what happens beyond. But also, I want to bring young people from other countries to come to see our institution and youth, to come and see how we think and carry out new projects. Meanwhile, I want much more vivid conversations with student organisations and their leaders. I want to meet them personally and I want to go to these organisations, to visit and meet each other. At the same time, we are trying to support this financing area as much as possible, depending on how we are supported.

Another part, to keep up with technology is very, very important for us. I would like to organise a brigade of CCS volunteers, that’s how I call them. Because there are many events, activities and young people who would like to get in touch, we try to support organisations like COS and FTC, by inviting young people to events. I call it a cultural phenomenon, because I am a follower of the online environment, but I also think everything happens and feels in the physical environment.”

The city of Cluj-Napoca is a suitable place, because the community of young people and students is very strong, very ingenious and with a lot of initiative, but it may not yet have the support, both financially and the listening they need. They still don’t have the structure they need, the spaces to exist, because we are talking about dozens of NGOs and youth organisations, who are struggling with the necessary quotes to carry out his activity. I do not consider that there is enough space to develop, we try to help as we can and we can host a certain number, but the number of young people and students and projects is much higher, here you only must listen and have a discussion with all the factors that have a direct or indirect contribution.”

Future project

“I am thinking of creating a cultural journalism project, that’s what I called it, by identifying young volunteers to participate in all our events, who can write articles and can film, photograph and can create a portfolio with everything that CCS means.”

The perceived utility of Cluj Youth Mapping

“I can’t wait for the result, I think such projects are needed, because if you don’t have a landmark, you can only freely create on the subject. From the moment you have everything concretely, you can work much better, you can come with funding, you can come with projects. It will definitely help me, and it will be a discussion following the report with all the actors involved. I think it’s a project that will help in the next 10 years.”

Youth Cluj Mapping as a Good practice for the Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of the Council of Europe

In the end, it brings us great pleasure to announce that our colleague, Francesca Cristea, as part of her mandate of youth delegate to the Congress of local and regional authorities of the Council of Europe for 2023, has presented our project in the plenary on the 44th and 45th sessions of the Congress. The interventions are available here: https://youtu.be/SkijLAZaMkM and https://youtu.be/95g6JE3eIaU.

Moreover, the Cluj Youth Mapping is listed on the official website of the Congress as a successful project between young people and local authorities: https://rm.coe.int/summary-of-project-reports/1680ad0df3.

Checkpoint ARAS

Team composition

“In Checkpoint ARAS Cluj, we are 26 people of whom I am the only coordinator, and the others are the volunteers. In addition to the testing we actually do it in the city center every Tuesday and Thursday from 5 to 9 pm, we also test at gay-themed parties (such as the Kiki Circuit), or in the Delirio club. When we have the parade in Cluj, we test a week in advance anyone who wants to test themselves. And when it’s the international testing week, the last week of November, we’re open to everyone again. For young people, the idea of free service is very attractive.”

The scope of the organisation

“Checkpoint ARAS Cluj is the project of an NGO, of the ARAS association. ARAS is the Romanian Anti-AIDS Association. Checkpoint ARAS Cluj deals with the testing of sexually transmitted diseases, respectively HIV, Syphilis, Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C, for men who have sex with men and other men and trans people.”

“For the LGBT community, the fact that they come to an environment in which they can speak openly about sexually transmitted infection, about their orientation, a very fine connection is created between the person who tests and the one who is in front of him or her. This is again a thing that helps them a lot, because sex is still a taboo subject for young people and their parents.”

Carried out projects

“We also do the counselling part. We call it counselling, but actually it is counselling and information. People don’t just come to test themselves and leave. Before the test, we will discuss with them all the infections that are sexually transmitted – the four that I specified before but also for the others that are present in the community, such as gonorrhoea and chlamydia. We have a project called Communicate through which they can order gonorrhoea and chlamydia tests, which later reach us and are sent to the UK to receive a result. The project has existed in Romania for 4 years and this is the
last year of activity. We have a fairly large number of registered persons and the target that we initially set for ourselves and that the financier had was far exceeded.”

“In addition to the Communicate project, where we deal with the counselling part through which we want everyone to know what healthy sex means, how infections are transmitted and how they can be protected, we have another project called PREP Romania. PREP means pre-exposure prophylaxis. This PREP treatment can be taken by people who are at risk of HIV infection and if they take these pills first, they will no longer become infected with this virus. This treatment is currently not legislated in Romania, there are many who order it from abroad but in Romania it does not exist. The purpose of this project is for us to oblige the Ministry of Health to bring PREP to Romania, so that everyone has access to this treatment.”

Popularization of the work

“We also reach people through applications dedicated to the LGBT community – Grindr, Romeo, and others like Tinder and Bumble. So, we are on all dating platforms, but also on general social media platforms such as Instagram, Facebook and so on. I deal with the direct promotion part and the messages I send on those applications, so that people can hear about us and come to test themselves.”

“Predominantly what is happening is in the city – in Cluj Napoca and in the surrounding areas. We had another project through which we tested at Pata Rat, the Roma community. But we also have people coming from Mures, Sălaj and Bihor to test themselves. When it comes to the LGBT community, clearly if they have the option to test, they will approach us.”

Funding

“We exist only through sponsorships. Sponsorship comes from the individual who comes to us for testing (3.5% of the tax donated to us), the tax that companies can give us once a year, followed by large sponsorships (for example the one from Durex in the beginning of the project). We, ARAS, are part of a world organisation called Coalition plus. I hope I’m not mistaken, there are somewhere between 40-50 countries in the world members here and we receive money from this coalition as well. Subordinated to Coalition Plus is an organisation in France called SIDAXION (seduction) and we receive money from them. This year the funding comes directly from Elton John foundation. The French consulate in Cluj sponsors us every year and that’s about it.” Encountered difficulties

“I believe that at the local level, even if we are in an open declarative city, when it comes to the LGBT community, the local authorities are not ready for an opening to us. Recently we had great difficulties in getting the space we work in, but also in organising the annual parade. The story of the delayed answers for PRIDE has been repeated for four years.”

“Apart from the authorities, to whom we asked for help for a center or we ask for their help once a year for the parade, we had no other problems, because the way we exist is not a big announcement, on the front gate as in “hey, we’re here and you can test if you are gay”. It’s a closed circuit, and only our community knows about it. I guess if we were public, I expect more problems to arise, but so far, in two and half years I have had no other problems.”

Plans for the future

“Our trajectory is very well established, and when it comes to development or getting elsewhere, we have no other plans. The Checkpoint project has expanded throughout the country – we have centers in Iasi, Cluj and Timișoara. As local organisations we want to reach the neighbouring counties or the geographic area, in our case Transylvania. There are also projects we are working on now. The PREP project will last all year and we would very much like it to happen next year. In Cluj there are a number of 60 individuals who can benefit from this free treatment, which costs in an average
month 250 lei. Related to the one with the test for gonorrhoea and chlamydia, we want to try to force the Romanian state to bring the test of these bacterial infections closer to our era.”

“We are now working on a kit for very specific situations. It’s still a taboo subject, but it’s something that happens frequently. I’m talking about sex parties that involve drugs and become sex practice (sex on chemicals). We want to create a kind of kit for those who go to such parties in large groups and come to us to test. We are not trying to get people to give up drugs, this is not our goal. If we wanted to do this, we would need a lot of resources – psychologists, a lot of financial resources, things we don’t have and so we can’t act here. We can, however, offer these kits for free, the goal being for those who have sex or use psychoactive substances, to do so in a safe way.”

“Cluj-Napoca is clearly a city in continuous development, it attracts a lot of people, especially young people. We will be there for everyone who comes to the test. It is obvious that in autumn, when new students come, the number of appointments increase. Certainly, when new students come, they turn to our services.”

DATABASE AND VISUAL MAP

Using and continuously updating the database created by the Cluj Youth Mapping project: To promote collaboration and address systemic issues in the youth field, the continuous use and update of the database created by the Cluj Youth Mapping project is recommended.

Strategic direction: The database will serve as a valuable resource for all stakeholders involved in working with youth and in the development of youth policies and programs.

Organising and updating the Cluj Youth Mapping project database by FTC requires careful planning and a systematic approach. Here’s a step-by-step propose on how to organise, update, visualise, and maintain the database in a self-sustaining manner:

Database Organization:

● Data Structure:
Define a clear and standardised data structure for the database, including fields such as demographic information, youth programs, organisations, and systemic issues.
Use a relational database management system (RDBMS) to store and manage the data efficiently.
● User Access Levels:
Implement different user access levels (e.g., administrators, contributors, viewers) to control who can add, edit, and view data.
● Data Validation Rules:
Establish validation rules to ensure data accuracy and consistency.
Implement dropdown menus, checkboxes, and other validation mechanisms to standardise input.

Updating Mechanism:

● Scheduled Data Updates:
Set up a schedule for quarterly and annual updates, considering the dynamic nature of youth-related information.
Allocate dedicated staff or volunteers responsible for data updates.
Automated Data Collection:
Explore the possibility of automated data collection through web forms, surveys, or integration with other relevant platforms.
Develop APIs for seamless data exchange with partner organisations.
● Data Quality Checks:
Implement automated data quality checks to identify and address inconsistencies
or errors.

Regularly review and refine data validation rules based on feedback and usage patterns.

Data Visualization:

● Dashboard Development:
Create an interactive dashboard that visualises key metrics, trends, and insights from the database.
Use charts, graphs, and maps to make the information easily understandable.
● User-Friendly Interface:
Design a user-friendly interface that allows stakeholders to explore and interact with the data effortlessly.
Provide customizable views and filters for personalised data exploration.
● Regular Reporting:
Generate automated quarterly and annual reports highlighting the most significant changes, achievements, and challenges in the youth sector.

Self-Running Mechanism:

● Automated Notifications:
Set up automated notifications to remind users of upcoming data submission deadlines.
Use alerts for data quality issues, encouraging contributors to update information promptly.
● Documentation and Training:
Develop comprehensive documentation and training materials to guide users on database usage and updates.
Provide ongoing support and training sessions as needed.

Cost and Organization:

● Budget Planning:
Estimate the costs associated with database development, maintenance, and updates.
Seek funding from government grants, private organisations, or partnerships with relevant stakeholders.
● Collaborative Partnerships:
Foster partnerships with local organisations, academic institutions, and businesses to share resources, expertise, and costs.
● Sustainability Model:
Explore the feasibility of creating a self-sustaining model, such as charging a nominal fee for access to the database or seeking sponsorships.

Target Audience and Benefits:

● Stakeholders:
The database serves local government agencies, non-profit organisations, educational institutions, researchers, and policymakers involved in the youth sector.
● Benefits:
Enables evidence-based decision-making in the development of youth policies and programs.
Facilitates collaboration and information sharing among stakeholders.
Supports advocacy efforts by providing reliable data on youth-related issues.

ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATION

Based on the mapping and research, here are proposed six key actionable recommendations:

Developing and empowering youth consultation mechanisms to foster collaborative governance:

To effectively increase youth participation in decision-making processes that impact their lives, it is essential to develop and empower youth consultation mechanisms at local, national, and European levels. This can be achieved through regular consultations, participatory budgeting, and direct involvement of young people in the creation and implementation of policies and programs designed for them. A notable example of such an initiative is the comanagement system implemented by the Council of Europe, which has been successfully applied in Cluj-Napoca through the Cluj-Napoca Youth Consultative Council. This pioneering model in Romania serves as an exemplary framework that should be replicated by Consultative Councils in other cities and towns across the country to ensure that the needs and opinions of youth are effectively reflected in policy making.

Locally, in Cluj-Napoca, The Youth Consultative Council (Y.C.C.) or in Romanian, Consiliul Consultativ de Tineret (C.C.T) is the only functional youth consultation mechanism created based on Law 350/2006 and includes the Cluj Metropolitan Area. Approved on December 6, 2021, it currently has 45 members (youth and youth-serving organisations, plus experts) and a permanent guest (the Cluj County Students’ Council – without legal personality). There are clear membership criteria formulated based on the current law. The ten areas of interest covered by the Y.A.C.’s activities are: 1) education and training, 2) counselling, 3) employment, 4) culture and art, 5) creativity and innovation,entrepreneurship, 6) health, 7) volunteering, 8)sports and healthy living, environment, 9) social inclusion and support for young families, and 10) international cooperation. All these areas are addressed transversally in the Integrated Urban Development Strategy (IUDS 2021-2030).

● The recommendation is at the level of operationalizing the process of creating resolutions and recommendations from the Y.C.C. in Cluj-Napoca to fulfil the objectives set out in the organizing and functioning regulations, as well as operationalizing similar mechanisms within other institutions (eg: Cluj County Council managing funds for youth projects and programs. This includes, specifically:

1. Developing a long-term thinking mechanism to create systemic changes on identified youth needs priority areas, and to overcome the issue of the annual change in Y.C.C. composition (NGO representatives).

2. Developing an annual process of educating representatives in the Y.C.C. plenary on civic engagement, and youth rights and responsibilities, to ensure active participation, consistency and continuity in developing public policies for the youth sector.

3. Defining a process for selecting priority work areas and how they are modified based on specific strategic research such as the Cluj Youth Profile (conducted every four years by the Cluj Youth Federation), Youth Barometer, Cluj Youth Mapping, LEAP study, social research study Activating Values in Urban Transitions or other relevant research.

4. OurCluj living laboratory, a 10- year program supported by Fondation Botnar since 2019 and has funded and catalyzed so far over 20 projects for youth wellbeing in Cluj in the amount of over EUR 8 million, can serve as a new locally owned space to cofund priority needs. This can be done together with the municipality and other local and international actors, including the EU, to strengthen much needed collaborative social innovation infrastructure for the entire youth ecosystems over the long term. Design of this process is in progress together with youth and other actors.

5. Developing documentation together with the Cluj Metropolitan Area Intercommunity Development Association (CMAIDA) regarding the opportunity to establish similar mechanisms in the other 19 administrative-territorial units (ATUs) within the metropolitan area, starting with Florești, and providing support in their operationalization.

  • Strategic direction for FTC: FTC will actively promote participatory budgeting and youth participatory budgeting initiatives, such as ComON Cluj, in the coming year. By enhancing these programs, we aim to significantly increase the involvement of young people in decision-making processes, enabling them to propose and fund direct solutions within their communities. Additionally, FTC will focus on strengthening youth consultation mechanisms by drawing inspiration from successful models like the Cluj-Napoca Youth Consultative Council. To further this effort, the Youth Cluj Federation will consult with its member organisations and the Cluj Youth Consultative Council to develop and propose resolutions for local authorities. For example, during the Cluj Youth Event, a panel discussion between local authorities and representatives of youth organisations addressed the possibility of Cluj-Napoca becoming the first city in Europe to implement the Youth Test. Through these initiatives, we strive to foster collaborative governance, empower youth to have a meaningful impact on policies and programs that affect them, and position Cluj-Napoca as a leader in youth engagement and innovative policy development.

1. Utilise and continuously update the interactive map: The interactive visual map developed through this project should be actively used and regularly updated to provide compass for young people to engage, to inform decision-making and to monitor progress in the youth sector. For more details, please check chapter IV where the plan is described.

2. Increasing funding for youth organisations: Based on the analysis conducted, it is recommended to increase funding and consistently support youth organisations, considering their significant impact on youth development and involvement in the community. It is also recommended that local authorities develop and maintain partnerships with youth organisations to ensure the continuity and effectiveness of the programs. What does exist in other EU member states are the operational grants that are aimed to help organisations to respond to their mission and conduct their day to day activity. In Romania, unfortunately, the majority of grants are short term (under one year) and they are published on certain subjects and this unfortunately gets organisations of civil society to adjust their mission in order to respond to the calls in order to be able to obtain financing in order to financially survive. It is important to try to implement the operational long term grants for organisations to be able to have financial stability for at least 2-3 years. OurCluj mechanism can play a crucial role in this process. Additionally, design this mechanism to encourage the development of co-funding opportunities over the long term and explore synergies with EU funding mechanisms. By strategically using Fondation Botnar grants and integrating these approaches, we can maximise the impact and sustainability of your projects.

  • Annual budget increase for youth projects and programs allocated from the Cluj municipality that would take into consideration the inflation rate, the rising cost for materials and especially for human resources. This is why we would recommend an increase of at least 3% every year to the budget of the municipality dedicated to the youth projects.

Strategic direction 1: Youth Cluj Federation with local partners and private sector will lead the advocacy process in which it will try to further ask for more funds for youth projects.

Strategic direction 2: Without having experience in accessing European funds (e.g., the Erasmus program) and neither specialised human resources, organisations do not benefit from budget allocations dedicated to developing organisational capacity.More local Cluj youth organisations will go to the information sessions offered by the Erasmus Agency in Romania and therefore will obtain funds on the European Solidarity Corps and other Erasmus financing lines, lead by Cluj Youth Center.

Strategic direction 3: For the local authorities, having youth NGOs as partners at loc level would also help meet the indicators set and would also strengthen the ties with citizens in implementation If the European methodology guides allows in specific cases, the youth organisations might be considered partners for implementation in European projects (eg. AJOFM with a youth NGO to apply for opening a youth center).

3. Strengthening youth infrastructure in the Cluj Metro Area: Invest in the creation and improvement of youth-friendly spaces and facilities throughout the city and metropolitan area, including community centers, sports facilities, cultural hubs, and recreational areas. These spaces should be accessible, inclusive, and designed with input from young people to meet their diverse needs and interests.

Strategic direction 1: FTC will continue the advocacy campaign to pursue local authorities to offer youth safe spaces.

Strategic direction 2: Local authorities (metropolitan area) should be able to identify youth friendly spaces that might be offered for free to the youth ecosystem so that activities should be conducted and can be included in OurCluj strategy.

4. Promoting and recognizing work with youth: The study highlighted a lack of recognition of the role of youth workers. Measures are recommended to increase the visibility and appreciation of this important role, including legislative initiatives at the national and European levels. It is important to invest in increasing the job of youth workers and therefore in their training (formal education and non formal education). The national and local authorities have to increase support for this profession by offering infrastructure (youth centers), offering access to resources and to other entities/ cities that can host local youth workers, have a consistent exchange of good practices and create a community of local/ national youth workers. To ensure a balance between the degree of autonomy and responsibility, the general competence of the occupation, the specific competences (youth center director, for example), and, of course, the required knowledge and educational background, the next five years will see the development of (new) occupational standards. A great example would be a formal education degree about youth studies in the UBB University hold together with NGOs as it is the model of the Western University of Timișoara that has announced the commencement of a bachelor and master programs on youth studies. 

Strategic direction 1: FTC will continue to host within the projects courses for youth workers for the ones who would like to further work in this field.

Strategic direction 2: The national and local authorities, guided by the consultations, should develop new occupational standards and new jobs where youth workers can develop the youth can develop the youth ecosystem.

5. Encouraging partnerships and collaborations: Observing that most organisations collaborate with many others, continuous encouragement of these partnerships is recommended to combat the lack of human resources and to increase the impact organisations can have in the community.

a. The Cluj Youth Pass can be a very effective program for recognizing volunteerism by the ecosystem (referring here to universities, the private sector, or public administration). Encouraging collaboration can be done by accepting youth NGOs and youth workers as direct partners in the European projects elaborated by local and national authorities. Youth NGOs already collaborate with the private sector,
especially the students’ NGOs as the students are considered future human resource and the companies see it as a method to recruit. Already private companies prefer young people who developed skills through volunteering as they are already trained in organising events, teamwork, communication, public affairs, etc.

Strategic direction 1: FTC will resume discussions on the development of the youth strategy at the level of the Cluj metropolitan area, which includes an extensive set of systemic actions that can contribute to the development of interorganizational partnerships. The realisation of this strategy itself proposes an approach that is as participatory as possible.

Strategic direction 2: Development of demo application in partnership with IT Clusters, included in OurCluj strategy for funding and promoted by the youth ecosystem.

6. Mental health and wellbeing

Mental Health is the most important aspect of which the present generations are concerned. Why? It is simple: they have been through an economic crisis, followed by the climate crisis, according to which young people feel their future being threatened, a pandemic which raised several periods of instability: pandemic, housing crisis, economic crisis again, etc. In Romania, the subjects only started to be discussed about. It is still a taboo subject in some communities. Youth organisations and youth workers are working in this direction in trying to raise awareness and to understand what would make young people comfortable. It is needed to normalise the special counselling on mental health and to grant access to young people especially those coming from precarious environments. It will take some years until mental health is accepted by society as an open subject.

Strategic direction 1: Cluj-Napoca has the opportunity to become an example of how we can educate the young generation so as to create the culture of well-being. Of course this is a long-term strategic outline, but by investing in activities, awareness and information campaigns created by the NGOs, we will get there. FTC will coordinate, together with the partners who launched the thematic year for youth in Cluj-Napoca, the 2nd edition of the Cluj Youth Event. This event aims to provide a space for reflection on what the thematic year for youth and the chosen theme – emotional health – meant. During this event, we will be able to reflect on the impact it had on the community and identify new avenues of action in bringing together initiatives from BEING Romania, LEAP 2.0, and other initiatives that promote the wellbeing and mental health of young people. 

APPENDIX

Definitions of young people

1. Table on reflecting the discrepancies of the young people’s definition and how the youth ecosystem translates in the international and national legal framework.

Youth has different age definitions according to the working organisation, national and European legislation, funding programmes guides.

Fondation Botnar, funding this project, defines youth between 10-24 years old, but follows local definitions if different.

Glossary

Informal group is a group of young people without legal personality, provided that their representatives have the legal capacity to undertake legal obligations on their behalf. These groups of young people can be applicants and partners in some Actions of Erasmus+.

Youth work refers to every kind of activity from a social, cultural, educational, environmental or political spectrum performed by, with and for young people, in groups or at individual level. It can be done volunteered or paid base, based solely on non-formal education focused on increasing the participation of young people and inclusion in their community and the decision-making process.

Youth workers are working with young people, in a non-formal education or informal manner, focusing on their improvements on personal and social development through oneon-one relationships and group-based activities. Youth workers can perform voluntarily or paid, and they can act as trainers, facilitators, volunteers’ coordinators, etc., they take a socioeducational or social work- based approach.

Young organisations are understood as being youth-led, non-profit, voluntary nongovernmental associations. Their aim is to implement social/economic/cultural/political, etc., activities for young people and/or to engage in advocacy work to promote their cause. Usually, youth organisations focus on increasing youth participation in the life of the community and engage them with the decision-making factors. They should also offer opportunities for personal and professional development through leisure activities, voluntary projects and non-formal and informal learning processes.

Youth stakeholders are defined within the study as institutions, NGOs or companies that encompass the youth segment in their mission, even if not limited. For examples, we will define youth stakeholders as:

● institutions that provide spaces for youth organisations or youth events,
● institutions/ companies/ agencies that provide funding for youth events/ projects,
● local and national authorities that have attributions in youth policies,
● organisations that provide young people with activities even if they are not their only target group

Online survey respondents

2. Online survey respondents (organisations, other structures, institutions and companies)

 

About the Authors

This participatory research was developed by a team of researchers and practitioners from across different disciplines, generations and geographies. The research and mapping was a collaborative effort with Cluj Youth Federation and SDG Colab which stewards OurCluj living lab initiative in Cluj-Napoca, to foster new approaches to collaborate for youth wellbeing.

We extend our appreciation to the dedicated team whose collective efforts contributed significantly to this research project. The diverse skills and expertise each member brought to the table greatly enriched the outcomes achieved. Their diligent work and collaborative approach have been instrumental in advancing the scope and impact of our research. Thank you for your contributions and commitment to the project’s success.

Tudor Ogner, FTC, Project Manager.

Tudor, a true catalyst for change whose journey within the youth sector spans more than a decade. Armed with a passion for driving meaningful transformation, Tudor’s impact resonates deeply within the community, where he has consistently championed the active participation of young individuals in decisions that directly shape their lives.

From the outset, Tudor’s commitment to youth empowerment has been unwavering. His tireless efforts have revolved around advocating for the essential role of young voices in decision-making processes at the community level. His belief in the power of youth engagement as a vehicle for positive change has guided his work and has shaped his reputation as a prominent advocate for this cause.

Tudor’s influence extends beyond advocacy, as he actively lends his expertise to various projects designed to support young people. His involvement in significant initiatives such as Cluj-Napoca’s 2015 European Youth Capital (as part of the management team), his role as co-founder and CEO of Romanian Youth Capital, and his leadership as President of the Cluj Youth Federation and the Youth Consultative Council are testaments to his exceptional leadership abilities.

Throughout his journey, Tudor’s impact has been felt through numerous projects and initiatives, including his contributions to the Cluj Youth Profile, the youth chapter of SIDU, Resolution of Youth (in both 2016 and 2021), LEAP, and FIX. His community-centric approach has extended to supporting the development of dozens of youth structures, nurturing their organisational capacity and resilience.

Tudor’s legacy is one of inspiration and action, demonstrating the profound effect that an individual dedicated to youth empowerment can have on a community. His multi-faceted involvement, from advocacy to hands-on project management, showcases his commitment to catalysing positive change. As a tireless advocate, leader, and mentor, Tudor continues to shape the trajectory of the youth sector, leaving an indelible imprint on the landscape he has worked tirelessly to uplift. 

Research team

Mihaela Roșu, Sociologist.

With a solid educational background, she earned her bachelor’s and master’s degrees in sociology before embarking on her current pursuit of a doctoral program in the same field. Her journey in academia has been punctuated by a diverse range of experiences, reflecting her versatile approach to sociological research. Having delved into various working environments, including private research settings and public universities, she now navigates the intricate landscape of the private financial sector.

A standout moment in her career was her collaboration on the study “Profilul Tânărului Clujean,” where she joined forces with fellow experts in the field and the Federația Tinerilor
din Cluj. This endeavour provided her with an up-close encounter with the youth population of Cluj-Napoca, allowing her to gain insights into their realities as they stood two years ago.

Presently, she lends her expertise within her current organisation, channelling her efforts into research studies that center on the aspirations and requirements of young individuals in relation to the labour market. Her dedication to understanding the dynamics between young people and the evolving job landscape underscores her commitment to driving meaningful change in both academia and the professional realm.

Francesca Cristea, Youth Policy Expert.

Francesca, a dynamic individual at 26 years of age, has passionately pursued a multifaceted educational journey, specialising in Political Science, International Relations, European Studies, Diplomacy, and Public Affairs. Her academic endeavours took her across esteemed institutions such as the University of Bucharest, Universidad Autonoma de Barcelona, and the European Academy of Diplomacy, where she honed her skills and cultivated a profound understanding of global dynamics.

Francesca’s impactful contributions have extended far beyond the classroom. Notably, she held the esteemed position of EU Youth Delegate during Romania’s Presidency to the Council of the European Union, making history as the first young person to address the Council of Youth Ministers. Her compelling address in May 2019 emphasised the significance of the EU Youth Strategy, leaving an indelible mark on the discourse surrounding youth engagement.

Her leadership and dedication to youth advocacy continued to flourish, marked by her appointment as the International Affairs Vice-President of the Romanian Youth Council (CTR) from November 2019 to July 2021. During this tenure, she championed international cooperation and played a pivotal role as the Romanian representative within the European Youth Forum, amplifying the voices of young people on a European stage. 

Since September 2022, Francesca has embraced a pivotal role as the Head of Policy & Programs at Europuls – Center of European Expertise. In this capacity, she leads the organisation’s public affairs initiatives, with a focus on youth empowerment, quality employment, and civil society. As the forefront representative of Europuls, she navigates the intricate intersections of policy and public interest, actively shaping a more inclusive and dynamic European landscape.

Francesca’s journey stands as a testament to her unwavering commitment to effecting positive change. Her academic prowess, impactful advocacy, and leadership on both national and international platforms underscore her status as a trailblazer and an inspiration to her peers and beyond.

Paul Marc, FTC, Research and Youth Participation Lead.

Paul Marc, an accomplished trainer and dedicated youth worker who has become a driving force in the Cluj-Napoca community. Presently, he holds the esteemed position of General Secretary at the Cluj Youth Federation, where he spearheads initiatives that empower and uplift the youth. Simultaneously, Paul is pursuing his academic aspirations as a master’s student at the prestigious Faculty of Political, Administrative, and Communication Sciences at Babes-Bolyai University.

In his recent years of active involvement in the youth sector, Paul has been a pivotal figure in shaping transformative projects. Notably, he played an instrumental role in the research endeavours of the Cluj Youth Profile and was deeply engaged with LEAP, the dynamic youth chapter of SIDU. His keen research insights have been invaluable in capturing the essence of the city’s youth demographic.

Paul’s expertise extends beyond research; he possesses a rich background in orchestrating youth consultation processes and co-design initiatives. This proficiency uniquely equips him to nurture holistic learning experiences that encompass every facet of a young person’s journey within diverse youth activities.

His collaborative spirit and impactful contributions have also resonated with the ComOn ClujNapoca team. In this capacity, he adeptly facilitated initiative groups, fostering a culture of innovation and inclusivity. Serving as an ambassador within various communities, Paul has successfully woven a tapestry of meaningful connections that bridge youth engagement and community development.

With a passion for catalysing positive change and an unwavering commitment to youth empowerment, Paul Marc emerges as an inspirational figure whose versatile skill set and dedicated efforts are reshaping the landscape of youth engagement in Cluj-Napoca and beyond.

Antonia Papiu, Public Health Researcher, SDG Colab.

Antonia Paula-Papiu is a dedicated and accomplished scholar who has embarked on a multifaceted academic journey, leaving her mark across the fields of Public Health and Health Management. She holds a Bachelor’s and Master’s degree in Public Health from the esteemed Babeș-Bolyai University, where she distinguished herself within the Faculty of Political, Administrative, and Communication Sciences, specifically in the Department of Public Health. Building on this foundation, she pursued a Master’s degree in Health Management at the Faculty of Medicine, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, further honing her expertise.

Antonia’s intellectual curiosity and commitment to impactful research have shaped her impressive academic trajectory. Her research endeavours revolve around pivotal areas such as youth well-being, health workforce dynamics, physical activity promotion, and mental health awareness. This passion for understanding the intricate nuances of these domains has been nurtured through her active engagement in various projects within the Department of Public Health.

In the vibrant landscape of initiatives, Antonia is a driving force behind the OurCluj project. Within this context, she shoulders the responsibility of overseeing the youth network, playing a crucial role in fostering connections and opportunities for the city’s young populace. Furthermore, her involvement extends to education-related initiatives, where she spearheads the C-EDU network, contributing to the enrichment of educational experiences for local youth. Her organisational acumen comes to the fore as she orchestrates local meetings, seamlessly bringing together diverse stakeholders for meaningful discourse.

Recognizing her potential as a change-maker, Antonia’s journey took a new trajectory in 2022 as she joined SDG Colab. In this capacity, she undoubtedly continues to harness her intellectual fervour and dedication to contributing to the Sustainable Development Goals, leaving an indelible impact on the spheres of health, education, and community engagement.

Antonia Paula-Papiu stands as a testament to the transformative power of interdisciplinary education and a passion-driven pursuit of knowledge. Her dynamic involvement in various projects and initiatives is not only a testament to her commitment to growth but also a source of inspiration for those around her.

Ștefan Lazăr, Community and Public Health Researcher, SDG Colab

Ștefan Lazăr, a forward-thinking individual who is making a significant impact within the realm of Public Health. Currently pursuing his studies at the prestigious Faculty of Political, Administrative, and Communication Sciences at Babeș-Bolyai University, Ștefan’s academic journey has been marked by a commitment to both learning and meaningful engagement.

As a student dedicated to Public Health, Ștefan has seamlessly integrated his passion for improving the well-being of others with his academic pursuits. His altruistic spirit shines through in his extensive volunteer work with student organisations, where he has tirelessly contributed to projects designed to enhance the lives of young students. His direct involvement in numerous initiatives speaks volumes about his dedication to fostering positive change within the student community.

Drawing inspiration from his experiences, Ștefan has embraced a path of innovation and development. Encountering the power of collaboration and the potential for change through his engagement in various faculty projects, he has become an advocate for the idea that the future must be built upon a foundation of mutual collaboration and a shared drive for transformation.

In 2022, Ștefan took his commitment to a new level by joining the SDG CoLab team. His decision to become a part of this dynamic collective was driven by a desire to contribute to the OurCluj project, a mission close to his heart. By uniting like-minded organisations, he aims to amplify the impact of initiatives aimed at promoting the well-being of young individuals. His role within the team underscores his dedication to fostering connections and mobilising collective efforts for a better future.

Ștefan Lazăr embodies the spirit of positive change, driven by a genuine concern for the wellbeing of his peers and a steadfast belief in the power of collaboration. His journey exemplifies the potential of combining academic pursuits with meaningful engagement, ultimately paving the way for a more harmonious and empowered community.

Community engagement team

Mihaela Andreea Apostu, FTC, Community and Administrative Lead.

A dedicated advocate for civil society engagement, who has dedicated over six years to fostering youth participation and innovation within the public sphere. Her commitment to creating positive change has been exemplified through her active involvement as a Board Member of various student organisations.

Andreea’s journey is marked by her extensive volunteer experience, which has not only allowed her to contribute meaningfully to various causes but has also honed her leadership skills and fostered a profound sense of teamwork. Through her hands-on involvement, she has cultivated an ability to guide and inspire others, while also effectively collaborating to achieve common goals.

Her areas of expertise extend across several critical domains, including organisational management, project management, and societal innovation. Notably, Andreea’s passion lies in refining efficiency techniques within both workplaces and broader society. Her unwavering dedication to streamlining processes and optimising outcomes reflects her commitment to creating a more effective and impactful environment for all. 

Since 2019, Andreea’s influence has extended into the professional realm as a Project Officer and Community Expert within the Cluj IT Cluster team. Her role in several EU funded projects underscores her dedication to driving tangible progress at a broader scale. Andreea’s knack for bringing together diverse groups and her adeptness at navigating complex challenges contribute to the success of these initiatives.

Andreea’s journey is an embodiment of proactive citizenship and the pursuit of innovation for societal betterment. Her diverse skill set, fueled by a passion for progress, is a testament to her commitment to making a lasting impact within civil society and beyond.

Raluca Bogdan, FTC, Human Resources Expert.

Raluca is an accomplished individual whose journey through the realm of Economic Sciences has been marked by a blend of academic excellence and dedicated community engagement. With dual degrees in Management, both at the bachelor’s and master’s levels, Raluca’s academic prowess is evident. However, her impact goes beyond the classroom, making her a dynamic force within various spheres.

From the outset of her studies, Raluca’s proactive spirit led her to immerse herself in student organisations and community endeavours. Her journey through different roles, transitioning from HR to fundraising and then onto event organisation, underscores her versatile skill set and adaptability. Her ability to seamlessly navigate different aspects of organisational dynamics has been a hallmark of her contributions.

Beyond her organisational pursuits, Raluca is deeply invested in nurturing the community of authentic creators in Romania. Her commitment to fostering growth and development within this creative community underscores her dedication to fostering collaboration and innovation.

Raluca’s disciplined approach to life extends to her personal interests. With a passion for cooking and a strong advocate for a healthy lifestyle, she exemplifies the harmonious balance between ambition and self-care.

In all aspects of her life, Raluca emanates a sense of organisation, commitment, and a drive for progress. Her multifaceted skill set and enthusiastic engagement make her a pivotal figure in shaping the future of her community, whether through her role in the Youth Federation of Cluj, her event organisation endeavours, or her contribution to the flourishing creative landscape in Romania.

Kinga Szekely, FTC, Group Expert.

Kinga Szekely, a seasoned professional who has made significant contributions to the realmof youth research as the Hungarian Community Expert. With a background rooted in her areas of expertise, Kinga brings a wealth of knowledge to every endeavour she undertakes.

Kinga’s journey has been characterised by her proficiency in project management and coordination, skills that have proven invaluable in her role as the Hungarian Community Expert. Her ability to oversee and navigate complex projects demonstrates a commitment to ensuring their success and impact. This dedication to precision and organisation has allowed her to seamlessly guide the research project towards meaningful outcomes.

In addition to her project management prowess, Kinga is a proficient communicator across cultures. Her intercultural communication skills enable her to effectively bridge gaps and foster collaboration among diverse teams and communities. This capability is particularly significant in the context of youth research, where understanding and embracing various perspectives are paramount.

Kinga’s acumen extends to administrative operations, where her attention to detail and organisational skills shine. Her ability to manage the logistical aspects of projects ensures that everything runs smoothly and efficiently, allowing the focus to remain on the research and its objectives.

As the Hungarian Community Expert on the youth research project, Kinga Szekely has showcased her dedication, expertise, and versatility. Her project management proficiency, intercultural communication skills, and administrative competence have collectively contributed to the success of the initiative. Kinga’s commitment to advancing the field of youth research is a testament to her proactive approach and the impact she leaves on every endeavour she undertakes.

Vlad Andrei Cimpoeșu, FTC, Group Expert.

Vlad is a passionate advocate for the transformative power of volunteering within the youth sector. With more than 5 years of hands-on experience, Vlad stands as a remarkable figure who has not only witnessed but actively shaped the evolution of Cluj-Napoca’s community.

The fusion of volunteering and youth engagement is a subject Vlad speaks about with unwavering conviction. His enduring commitment to the youth sector has positioned him as a dynamic force, contributing significantly to the ongoing transformation of the community. In this capacity, he has become an essential catalyst for change, utilising his expertise to inspire and empower young individuals.

Vlad’s remarkable demeanour exudes a rare combination of charisma and dedication. His presence alone is an embodiment of the passion he brings to his work. With an unyielding ambition to drive positive change, he has consistently gone above and beyond to champion the voices and needs of young people. His dedication is not confined to words alone; it is evidenced through his actions and the impact he has generated. 

An advocate for the “ideal youth environment,” Vlad has not only dreamt of such a space but has actively worked to make it a reality. His tireless efforts have served as a beacon of inspiration for young individuals, urging them to recognize their potential and to put in the necessary effort to create the world they aspire to inhabit. Through his guidance, he has instilled a sense of purpose and a collective determination among his peers

Vlad’s journey is a testament to the profound impact that one individual can have when fueled by genuine passion and a steadfast commitment to fostering change. His presence in the youth sector has not only elevated his community but has also set a precedent for what is possible when dedication and a belief in the potential of young people intersect.

Communication and design team

Patrik Rojan, FTC, MarTech Lead.

Patrik is a self-proclaimed marketing aficionado with an insatiable appetite for optimization, especially within the realm of the youth sector. With a driving ambition to fine-tune every aspect of his work, Patrik has embarked on a journey that reflects his dedication to constant improvement.

Patrik’s immersion in the youth sector began in 2015, when he took his first steps as a volunteer within a student NGO. Since then, his journey has been a dynamic evolution, each phase a testament to his unwavering commitment to enhancing the lives of young individuals. This devotion has seen him grow and thrive, leaving an indelible mark on the organisations he has been a part of.

At present, Patrik’s role centers on forging meaningful connections within the young community. His efforts are geared toward facilitating the transnational interconnection of various youth structures, fostering a collaborative environment that enables the exchange of best practices. This role showcases his commitment to enhancing the operational efficacy and organisational development of all parties involved, paving the way for a more interconnected and impactful youth sector.

Beyond his professional pursuits, Patrik boasts a wealth of expertise in project management, organisational growth, and human resources development. These competencies serve as a testament to his holistic approach to creating sustainable and impactful change. His ability to navigate intricate projects, nurture organisational expansion, and foster the growth of individuals underscores his multifaceted skill set.

Patrik’s journey is a testament to the transformative power of passion and commitment. His dedication to optimization and the betterment of the youth sector exemplifies his relentless pursuit of progress. In every endeavour, he stands as a driving force, igniting change and inspiring those around him to strive for excellence and impact.

Diana Dunca, FTC, Communication Specialist.

Diana, a dynamic and emerging figure in the realm of marketing, driven by her enthusiasm for event planning and a relentless pursuit of excellence.

Diana’s philosophy is rooted in the belief that success is cultivated through a harmonious blend of hard work, boundless creativity, and an unwavering sense of empathy. These core values not only guide her professional path but also infuse her endeavours with a distinct authenticity and effectiveness.

A perpetual wellspring of ideas, Diana can often be found immersed in her creative process, weaving new concepts and strategies that push boundaries and set new standards. Her insatiable thirst for learning fuels her quest for growth, and her determination to stay ahead of the curve is evident in her constant pursuit of new knowledge and innovative approaches.

Diana’s prowess extends across various domains, where she has honed her skills in communication, copywriting, marketing strategy, and social media management. Her talent lies not only in conveying ideas effectively but also in crafting narratives that resonate and inspire action. Her keen understanding of the digital landscape makes her a valuable asset in navigating the ever-evolving world of marketing.

Her ability to harness her skill set and channel it into meaningful outcomes reflects her commitment to her craft. Diana’s presence is a testament to the impact that a driven and creative professional can have in today’s competitive landscape. With her blend of technical expertise and a passion for innovation, she stands poised to leave her mark and inspire others to embrace their own unique journey.

Andrei Coman, FTC, Design Specialist.
Barbara Bulc, SDG Colab, Visioner and Strategist.

Barbara Bulc is a social designer and the founder, and CEO of the non- profit collaboratory SDG Colab and advisory group Global Development in Geneva, Switzerland.

Her transdisciplinary practice focuses on design and research of alternative collaborative structures prioritising wellbeing of people, othe rspecies and the planet over economic growth. She worked for over two decades in leadership roles in global diplomacy, business, public health, and international development in over 30 countries. After serving as a former Senior Advisor at the Clinton Foundation, CEO at Global Business Coalition, and CEO of KRKA

Pharmaceuticals in New York, she has dedicated her current practice to reimagining values and relationships, essential to shift the current economic paradigm towards a more inclusive and regenerative future.

She is the author of publications and articles about rethinking multi-stakeholder partnerships and governance, including Activating Values in Urban Transitions (2022) about OurCluj, a series of articles The Urgency for Transforming Youth Engagement and A Roadmap for Intergenerational Leadership in Planetary Health (The Lancet Planetary Health, 2020).

A systems thinker and mindfulness practitioner, she studied chemistry, social sciences and business management at Ljubljana University, Columbia University and Judge Business School at University of Cambridge.

We extend our heartfelt gratitude and special thanks to the remarkable volunteers, dedicated youth workers, and invaluable public institutions who provided unwavering support throughout the implementation of our research. Your commitment, enthusiasm, and collaborative efforts have been instrumental in shaping the success and impact of this endeavour. Your tireless dedication and contributions have not only enriched the research process but have also fortified our shared goal of advancing knowledge and fostering positivechange within our community. Your support is a testament to the power of collective action and collaboration. Thank you for being essential pillars in our journey of discovery and transformation.

Youth Workers team:
● Siviroveanu Vlada
● Mihaela Ionela Furculita
● Sas Denisa
● Petrice Simina (translator)
● Biriș Carmen
● Nica Hermina

Volunteers team:
● David Condor
● Dudulica Andreea
● Ielciu Teodora
● Petrenciu Alexia
● Ismail Ania
● Rujoiu Maria
● Andreica Alexia
● Bîcu Teodora-Maria
● Redai David
● Popa Iulia
● Grama Stefan
● Redai David
● Lateș Andreea
● Chirca Elena
● Ursa Sergiu
● Andreica Alexia

Special thanks and appreciations for:

Casa de Cultură a Studenților Cluj – Napoca.

The Student Culture House has represented from its beginnings a space for young and free spirits of authentic culture, offering young people an elevated alternative for spending their leisure time. The Student Culture House is an environment in which the artistic and moral qualities of young students are developed; it is a space for the expression of cultural experiments as well as for the promotion and affirmation of young talents.

Our heartfelt appreciation goes to Flavius Milasan, CCS Executive Director, and Violeta Avram, CCS Cultural Referent, for their unwavering support throughout the entirety of our project. Their dedication, guidance, and commitment have been instrumental in steering us towards success. Their expertise and willingness to assist have significantly contributed to the smooth implementation and positive outcomes of our endeavour. We are truly grateful for their invaluable contributions and steadfast partnership, which have been pivotal in making this project a reality.

Cluj-Napoca Youth Center.
A space dedicated to youth activities in Cluj-Napoca, specially designed to provide the necessary support in the development and implementation of projects aimed at youngpeople. The Youth Center’s main objective is to encourage and support educational, cultural, and youth activities by providing the necessary infrastructure for their implementation to young individuals.

Our sincere gratitude goes to Florin Moroșanu and Ioana Trușan from the Cluj Youth Center for their unwavering support throughout the entirety of our project. Their dedication, expertise, and collaborative spirit have been pivotal in guiding us towards the achievement of our goals. Their consistent assistance and valuable insights have significantly contributed to the seamless execution and successful outcomes of our endeavour. We deeply appreciate their steadfast partnership and the integral role they’ve played in making this project a resounding success.

RESOURCES

1. CETĂȚENI/DEZBATERI PUBLICE/CONSULTARE PUBLICĂ/ Constituirea Consiliului Consultativ de
Tineret Cluj-Napoca și aprobarea regulamentului de organizare și funcționare,
https://primariaclujnapoca.ro/cetateni/dezbatere-publica/constituirea-consiliului-consultativ-detineret-cluj-napoca-si-aprobarea-regulamentului-de-organizare-si-functionare/
3. Cluj-Napoca City Hall and Council, Cultural and Youth Programs Bureau,
https://primariaclujnapoca.ro/organigrama/consiliul-local/serviciul-public-pentru-administrareobiective-culturale/serviciul-programe-si-strategii-culturale-si-pentru-tineret/
4. COM’ON Cluj-Napoca. Last accessed on January 20, 2023, at https://comoncluj.ro/rules
5. COM’ON Cluj-Napoca. Wrapping up Com’ON Cluj-Napoca ’22. Last accessed on January 20, 2023
at https://comoncluj.ro/news/wrapping-up-com-on-cluj-napoca-22
6. Council of Europe. Advisory Council on Youth. https://www.coe.int/en/web/youth/advisorycouncil-on-youth
7. Council of Europe. Contribution of ERASMUS+ partner countries to EU YOUTH WIKI CHAPTER I
BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA: YOUTH POLICY GOVERNANCE, https://pjpeu.coe.int/documents/42128013/114007071/Youth+Wiki+Bosnia+and+Herzegovina.pdf/f47b247f
-f05d-417c-93ea-adbe7a9d610f
8. Council of Europe. Contribution of partner countries to EU Youth Wiki: Albania Youth Policy
Governance. https://pjp-eu.coe.int/documents/42128013/114007071/Youth-WikiAlbania.pdf/f3355a46-9dc3-156b-95ab-3fab48f10964
9. Council of Europe. Contribution of partner countries to EU Youth Wiki: Armenia Youth Policy
Governance. https://pjpeu.coe.int/documents/42128013/114007071/Armenia_YouthWiki+Chapter1.pdf/f6f3d536-2d00-
f0bd-8247-f261158d619e?t=1641895824000
10. Council of Europe. Country sheet on youth policy in Montenegro. Last accessed on January 20,
2023, at https://pjp-eu.coe.int/documents/42128013/63134234/Youth_policy-MNE2020.pdf/2f9332e6-6629-58b4-0d82-256aa5be8c06
11. Council of Europe. European Steering Committee for Youth (CDEJ),
https://www.coe.int/en/web/youth/cdej
11. Council of Europe. European Youth Foundation. https://www.coe.int/en/web/youth/about-us
12. Council of Europe. European Youth Strategies – A reflection and analysis. Last accessed on January
20, 2023 at https://pjpeu.coe.int/documents/42128013/101043895/European+Youth+Strategies+-
+reflection+paper.pdf/ba2cb002-9705-620d-3ddb-bc4939c6d3b4
13. Council of Europe. Joint Council on Youth. https://www.coe.int/en/web/youth/joint-council-onyouth
14. Council of Europe. Programming Committee on Youth.
https://www.coe.int/en/web/youth/programming-committee
15. Council of Europe. Strengthening youth work in cities and regions.
https://rm.coe.int/strenghening-youth-work-in-cities-and-regions-recommendations-of-thec/1680a49dcf

16. Council of Europe. Youth Delegates. Rejuvenating politics.
https://www.coe.int/en/web/congress/youth-delegates
17. Council of Europe. Youth Department. https://www.coe.int/en/web/youth/about-us
18. Council of Europe. Youth organizations and youth programmes. Last accessed on January 20, 2023
at https://pjp-eu.coe.int/en/web/youth-partnership/youth-organisations-and-youth-programmes
19. Council of Europe. Youth Sector Strategy 20230. Last accessed on January 20, 2023 at
https://rm.coe.int/background-document-youth-sector-strategy-2030-english/1680a0bb33
20. Council of Europe. Youth Work. What exactly is youth work?. Last accessed on January 20, 2023 at
https://www.coe.int/en/web/youth/youth-work
21. Council of the EU. Czech Presidency of the Council of the European Union. EU Youth Council
discusses intergenerational dialogue. November 28, 2022. Accessed lastly on January 5, 2022 at
https://czech-presidency.consilium.europa.eu/en/news/eu-youth-council-discussesintergenerational-dialogue/
22. COUNCIL RESOLUTION of 27 November 2009 on a renewed framework for European cooperation
in the youth field (2010-2018) (2009/C 311/01) . Last accessed on January 20, 2023 at https://eurlex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32009G1219(01)&qid=1620472947400&from=EN
23. Criminal Code. Law 286/2009. https://lege5.ro/Gratuit/gezdmnrzgi/minoritatea-codulpenal?dp=gqytsojthe2tq
24. Delegat de tineret al României la ONU. http://unyouthdelegate.ro/
25. Diaria d’Andorra. El Govern considera caduc l’actual Pla Nacional de Joventut i en farà un de nou.
https://www.diariandorra.ad/noticies/nacional/2022/11/21/el_govern_considera_caduc_actual_p
la_nacional_joventut_fara_nou_211083_1125.html
26. EEA and Norway Grants. https://www.eeagrants.ro/en/about
27. EEA and Norway Grants. https://eeagrants.org/news/bringing-hope-pata-rat
28. European Commission. Agricultural and rural development. Young farmers.
https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/common-agricultural-policy/income-support/youngfarmers_en#supportforyoungfarmers
29. European Commission. DG EAC. https://knowledge4policy.ec.europa.eu/organisation/dg-eac-dgeducation-culture_en
30. European Commission. Erasmus+. Last accessed on January 20, 2023 at https://erasmusplus.ec.europa.eu/programme-guide/part-d/glossary-youth
31. European Commission. Mariya Gabriel. Commissioner on Innovation, Research, Culture, Education
and Youth. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/commissioners/2019-2024/gabriel_en
32. European Commission. The European Pillar of Social Rights Action Plan. Last accessed on January
27, 2023 at https://op.europa.eu/webpub/empl/european-pillar-of-social-rights/en/
33. European Parliament. CULT Committee.
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/committees/en/cult/about
34. European Parliament. REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of
the Council establishing a Recovery and Resilience Facility, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52020PC0408
35. European Parliament. Youth Hub. Charlemagne Youth Prize
https://youth.europarl.europa.eu/more-information/charlemagne-prize.html

European Youth Forum. Vote at 16. Last accessed on January 20, 2023 at
https://www.youthforum.org/topics/vote-at-16
37. European Youth Portal. The EU Youth Coordinator has been nominated!
https://youth.europa.eu/news/eu-youth-coordinator-has-been-nominated_en
38. Eurostat. Youth Overview.
https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/youth#:~:text=This%20section%20gathers%20statistics%20fro
m,for%20others%20by%20individual%20age.
39. Final Report of the Conference on the Future of Europe. Last accessed on January 20, 2023 at
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/resources/library/media/20220509RES29121/20220509RES2912
1.pdf
40. Hotărâre privind organizarea și funcționarea direcțiilor județene pentru familie și tineret, respectiv
a Direcției pentru Familie și Tineret a Municipiului București
https://sgg.gov.ro/1/wpcontent/uploads/2022/02/HG-28.pdf
41. Law 279/1999 regarding youth. Last accessed on January 27, 2023, at
https://www.legis.md/cautare/getResults?doc_id=95564&lang=ro
42. Law no. 272/2004 regarding the protection and promotion of children’s rights.
https://legislatie.just.ro/Public/DetaliiDocument/156097
43. Legea nr. 78/2014 privind reglementarea activităţii de voluntariat în România,
https://lege5.ro/gratuit/gm4tsojsgi/legea-nr-78-2014-privind-reglementarea-activitatii-devoluntariat-in-romania
44. Moldovan Government. Youth Sector 2022-2030 and an Action Plan. Last accessed on January 20, 2023, at
https://mecc.gov.md/sites/default/files/conceptul_strategiei_tineret_2030_si_a_programului_de_
implementare.pdf
45. National Report on the 7th cycle of the EU Youth Dialogue. Last accessed on January 10, 2023 at
http://mts.ro/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Raport-Na%C8%9Bional-Dialogul-UE-cu-Tinerii-.pdf
46. National Report on the 8th cycle of the EU Youth Dialogue. Last accessed on January 10, 2023 at
https://anosr.ro/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Raport-National-DUET.pdf
47. National Statistics Institute. Press communique regarding the first round of the census data
collected in 2021, Accessed last on November 28th, 2023, at:
https://insse.ro/cms/sites/default/files/com_presa/com_pdf/cp-date-provizorii-rpl2021_0.pdf
48. National Youth Law no. 350/2006. https://legislatie.just.ro/Public/DetaliiDocument/73834
49. Order 4406/2002, https://lege5.ro/gratuit/gqydgmzz/conducerea-caselor-de-cultura-studentestiregulament?dp=gezdsmbxhaztm
50. Plan Nacional de Joventut d’Andorra,
https://www.youthpolicy.org/national/Andorra_2008_National_Youth_Plan.pdf
51. Profilul tânărului Clujean, https://ftcluj.ro/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Raport-cercetare-1.pdf
52. respectiv a Direcției pentru Familie și Tineret a Municipiului București https://sgg.gov.ro/1/wpcontent/uploads/2022/02/HG-28.pdf
53. Romanian Youth Capital. https://capitalatineretului.ro/
54. Romanian Youth Capital. Romanian Youth Summit 7.0. Last accessed on January 20, 2023 at
https://capitalatineretului.ro/noutati/400-de-tineri-s-au-reunit-la-cluj-napoca-in-cadrulsummitului-tinerilor-7-0
55. Salto Youth. Underpinning Principle: Participation, Roger A. Hart (1992). Last accessed on January
20, 2023 at https://www.salto-youth.net/rc/inclusion/archive/archiveresources/inclusiongroups/inclusionethnicminorities/InclusionParticipation/

56. SALTO Youth. Youth policy in Russia. Last accessed on January 25, 2023, at https://www.saltoyouth.net/rc/eeca/eecapublications/eecamanual/eecamanualrussia/ythpolicyrus/
57. SFC2021 Programme supported from the ERDF (Investment for jobs and growth goal), ESF+, the
Cohesion Fund, the JTF and the EMFA), https://www.nord-vest.ro/wpcontent/uploads/2022/05/POR-NV-2021_2027.pdf
58. Strategia Integrată de Dezvoltare Urbană a zonei Metropolitane Cluj Orizont 2030-2050. Cluj
Metropolitan Strategie Integrată 2014-2020. Page 9. Last accessed on January 20, 2023 at
https://files.primariaclujnapoca.ro/2022/10/04/SIDU-Cluj_RO_Sep28.pdf
59. The data provided for the years 2018-2021 was requested and analyzed by the Romanian Youth
Council (CTR) at https://ctr.ro/subfinantarea-tineretului-rezista-dar-guvernul/
60. UBB. Student NGOs’ Projects Contest. Last accessed on February 30, 2022 at
https://csubb.stud.ubbcluj.ro/concurs-proiecte-ongs/
61. UNESCO. National Youth Policy of Georgia. Last accessed on January 20, 2023, at
https://en.unesco.org/creativity/policy-monitoring-platform/national-youth-policy-georgia
62. United Nations Security Council Resolution 2250 (2015) https://documents-ddsny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N15/413/06/PDF/N1541306.pdf?OpenElement
63. United Nations. Department of Economic and Social Affairs Youth.
https://www.un.org/development/desa/youth/what-we-do/youth-delegate-programme.html
64. United Nations. Human Rights 75 Youth Advisory Group. https://www.ohchr.org/en/youth/callapplications-human-rights-75-youth-advisorygroup?fbclid=IwAR3lzEXJLxhp8OF4vy1GXHpomWbiHcpsY0XY4kK6Vt1oAcEgpprbncLILFY
65. World Health Organizations. `Engaging young people for health and sustainable development`.
Definitions and diversity of young people, page 32
https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/274368/9789241514576-eng.pdf?ua=1
66. Youth Wiki. Austria. https://national-policies.eacea.ec.europa.eu/youthwiki/chapters/austria/13-
national-youth-strategy
67. Youth Wiki. Bulgaria. Last accessed on January 27, 2023, at https://nationalpolicies.eacea.ec.europa.eu/youthwiki/chapters/bulgaria/13-national-youth-strategy
68. Youth Wiki. Croatia. Last accessed on January 20, 2023, at https://nationalpolicies.eacea.ec.europa.eu/youthwiki/chapters/croatia/13-national-youth-strategy-0
69. Youth Wiki. Cyprus. Last accessed on January 20, 2023, at https://nationalpolicies.eacea.ec.europa.eu/youthwiki/chapters/cyprus/13-national-youth-strategy-0
70. Youth Wiki. Czech Republic. Last accessed on January 20, 2023, at https://nationalpolicies.eacea.ec.europa.eu/youthwiki/chapters/czech-republic/13-national-youth-strategy
71. Youth Wiki. Denmark. Last accessed on January 27,2023 at https://nationalpolicies.eacea.ec.europa.eu/youthwiki/chapters/denmark/11-target-population-of-youth-policy
72. Youth Wiki. Finland. Last accessed on January 20, 2023, at https://nationalpolicies.eacea.ec.europa.eu/youthwiki/chapters/finland/13-national-youth-strategy
73. Youth Wiki. France. Last accessed on January 20, 2023, at https://nationalpolicies.eacea.ec.europa.eu/youthwiki/chapters/france/13-national-youth-strategy
74. Youth Wiki. Frances. Last accessed on January 20, 2023, at https://nationalpolicies.eacea.ec.europa.eu/youthwiki/chapters/france/13-national-youth-strategy
75. Youth Wiki. Germany. Last accessed on January 27, 2023, at https://nationalpolicies.eacea.ec.europa.eu/youthwiki/chapters/germany/13-national-youth-strategy

76. Youth Wiki. Greece. Last accessed on January 20, 2023, at https://nationalpolicies.eacea.ec.europa.eu/youthwiki/chapters/greece/12-national-youth-law
77. Youth Wiki. Hungary. Last accessed on January 20, 2023, at https://nationalpolicies.eacea.ec.europa.eu/youthwiki/chapters/hungary/1-youth-policy-governance
78. Youth Wiki. Iceland. Last accessed on January 20, 2023, at https://nationalpolicies.eacea.ec.europa.eu/youthwiki/chapters/iceland/13-national-youth-strategy
79. Youth Wiki. Ireland. Last accessed on January 20, 2023, at https://nationalpolicies.eacea.ec.europa.eu/youthwiki/chapters/ireland/13-national-youth-strategy
80. Youth Wiki. Italy. Last accessed on January 20, 2023, at https://nationalpolicies.eacea.ec.europa.eu/youthwiki/chapters/italy/12-national-youth-law
81. Youth Wiki. Latvia. Last accessed on January 20, 2023, at https://nationalpolicies.eacea.ec.europa.eu/youthwiki/chapters/latvia/13-national-youth-strategy
82. Youth Wiki. Lithuania. Last accessed on January 20, 2023, at https://nationalpolicies.eacea.ec.europa.eu/youthwiki/chapters/lithuania/13-national-youth-strategy
83. Youth Wiki. Luxembourg. Last accessed on January 20, 2023, at https://nationalpolicies.eacea.ec.europa.eu/youthwiki/chapters/luxembourg/13-national-youth-strategy
84. Youth Wiki. Malta. Last accessed on January 20, 2023, at https://nationalpolicies.eacea.ec.europa.eu/youthwiki/chapters/malta/13-national-youth-strategy
85. Youth Wiki. Netherlands. Last accessed on January 20, 2023 at https://nationalpolicies.eacea.ec.europa.eu/youthwiki/chapters/netherlands/13-national-youth-strategy
86. Youth Wiki. Norway. Last accessed on January 20, 2023, at https://nationalpolicies.eacea.ec.europa.eu/youthwiki/chapters/norway/12-national-youth-law
87. Youth Wiki. Poland. Last accessed on January 25. 2023 at https://nationalpolicies.eacea.ec.europa.eu/youthwiki/chapters/poland/13-national-youth-strategy
88. Youth Wiki. Portugal. Last accessed on January 20, 2023, at https://nationalpolicies.eacea.ec.europa.eu/youthwiki/chapters/portugal/13-national-youth-strategy
89. Youth Wiki. Slovakia. Last accessed on January 20, 2023, at https://nationalpolicies.eacea.ec.europa.eu/youthwiki/chapters/slovakia/13-national-youth-strategy
90. Youth Wiki. Slovenia. Last accessed on January 28, 2023, at https://nationalpolicies.eacea.ec.europa.eu/youthwiki/chapters/slovenia/13-national-youth-strategy
91. Youth Wiki. Spain. Last accessed on January 20, 2023, at https://nationalpolicies.eacea.ec.europa.eu/youthwiki/chapters/spain/13-national-youth-strategy
92. Youth Wiki. Sweden. Last accessed on January 20, 2023, at https://nationalpolicies.eacea.ec.europa.eu/youthwiki/chapters/sweden/13-national-youth-strategy
93. Youth Wiki.Turkey. Last accessed on January 20, 2023, at https://nationalpolicies.eacea.ec.europa.eu/youthwiki/chapters/turkiye/13-national-youth-strategy
94. 2030 Digital Decade: Annex Romania, Accessed last on December 1, 2023 at https://digitalstrategy.ec.europa.eu/en/news/europes-digital-decade-commission-sets-course-towards-digitallyempowered-europe-2030

Scroll to Top